Page 1 of 1
Objective Morality
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:50 pm
by Eodnhoj7
To objectify something effectively is to observe its boundaries...period. If I objectively observe "x" circumstance, I am observing not just what structures it but the circumstance itself as a structure to further circumstance. In these respects we may observe the boundaries of all circumstances:
1) Projecting to further circumstances.
2) Circulating back to themselves.
3) In these respects all circumstance, specifically morality, maintain an objective nature of limit through the golden rule.
The golden rule is objective in the respect it encapsulates the undefinable aspect of the subjective nature and gives it structure in which one subjective reality is directed towards another subjective reality with these subjective realities canceling themselves out to an objective reality.
Take for example I am feeding a homeless person. I may feed this person because of some subjective feeling which has no real limits in itself (pity, compassion) while the person may need feed because of some subjective feeling which I do not feel (despair, etc.).
These subjective feelings effectively cancel themselves out under the objective act of the person with the home feeding the homeless person and the homeless person recieving the food. Now one may view this objective situation, subjectively, as either good or bad, however the fact remains the objective reality of "one person feeding another and the person recieving the food" exists.
Re: Objective Morality
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:00 pm
by philosopher
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:50 pm
To objectify something effectively is to observe its boundaries...period. If I objectively observe "x" circumstance, I am observing not just what structures it but the circumstance itself as a structure to further circumstance. In these respects we may observe the boundaries of all circumstances:
1) Projecting to further circumstances.
2) Circulating back to themselves.
3) In these respects all circumstance, specifically morality, maintain an objective nature of limit through the golden rule.
The golden rule is objective in the respect it encapsulates the undefinable aspect of the subjective nature and gives it structure in which one subjective reality is directed towards another subjective reality with these subjective realities canceling themselves out to an objective reality.
Take for example I am feeding a homeless person. I may feed this person because of some subjective feeling which has no real limits in itself (pity, compassion) while the person may need feed because of some subjective feeling which I do not feel (despair, etc.).
These subjective feelings effectively cancel themselves out under the objective act of the person with the home feeding the homeless person and the homeless person recieving the food. Now one may view this objective situation, subjectively, as either good or bad, however the fact remains the objective reality of "one person feeding another and the person recieving the food" exists.
How do they cancel out?
If we can objectively measure the subjective feelings, ie. brain scan or other scientific methods, the subjectivity becomes objective.
Then we can compare the objective feelings of pityness, comassion and despair, and we can construct an objective morality.
Re: Objective Morality
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:38 pm
by Eodnhoj7
philosopher wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:00 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:50 pm
To objectify something effectively is to observe its boundaries...period. If I objectively observe "x" circumstance, I am observing not just what structures it but the circumstance itself as a structure to further circumstance. In these respects we may observe the boundaries of all circumstances:
1) Projecting to further circumstances.
2) Circulating back to themselves.
3) In these respects all circumstance, specifically morality, maintain an objective nature of limit through the golden rule.
The golden rule is objective in the respect it encapsulates the undefinable aspect of the subjective nature and gives it structure in which one subjective reality is directed towards another subjective reality with these subjective realities canceling themselves out to an objective reality.
Take for example I am feeding a homeless person. I may feed this person because of some subjective feeling which has no real limits in itself (pity, compassion) while the person may need feed because of some subjective feeling which I do not feel (despair, etc.).
These subjective feelings effectively cancel themselves out under the objective act of the person with the home feeding the homeless person and the homeless person recieving the food. Now one may view this objective situation, subjectively, as either good or bad, however the fact remains the objective reality of "one person feeding another and the person recieving the food" exists.
How do they cancel out?
If we can objectively measure the subjective feelings, ie. brain scan or other scientific methods, the subjectivity becomes objective.
Then we can compare the objective feelings of pityness, comassion and despair, and we can construct an objective morality.
The subjective is that which is without measure...measuring the feelings through a brain scan effectively objectifies them to where they are no longer subjective but have inherent boundaries.
The subjective feeling turning into an action effectively turns it into an objective limit through the action itself.