It's a sign of the times
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 1:42 am
Petula Clark made this song popular. What does it suggest to you?
PhilX
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
That some Americans on a forum like to have the $tar$ & $tripe$ on their sign off.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 1:42 am Petula Clark made this song popular. What does it suggest to you?
PhilX
![]()
Your opinion. The title of the song matches the thread.attofishpi wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 2:57 pmThat some Americans on a forum like to have the $tar$ & $tripe$ on their sign off.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 1:42 am Petula Clark made this song popular. What does it suggest to you?
PhilX
![]()
What song?
Slight correction. The title of the song sung by Petula isPhilosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 3:30 pmYour opinion. The title of the song matches the thread.attofishpi wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 2:57 pmThat some Americans on a forum like to have the $tar$ & $tripe$ on their sign off.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 1:42 am Petula Clark made this song popular. What does it suggest to you?
PhilX
![]()
What song?
PhilX
![]()
You do know there is a thread for songs?Philosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 3:43 pmSlight correction. The title of the song sung by Petula isPhilosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 3:30 pmYour opinion. The title of the song matches the thread.attofishpi wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 2:57 pm
That some Americans on a forum like to have the $tar$ & $tripe$ on their sign off.
What song?
PhilX
![]()
A Sign of the Times. However she does sing it that way in the song.
PhilX
![]()
Sure, but I'm using the phrase for a different purpose.attofishpi wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 3:57 pmYou do know there is a thread for songs?Philosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 3:43 pmSlight correction. The title of the song sung by Petula isPhilosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 3:30 pm
Your opinion. The title of the song matches the thread.
PhilX
![]()
A Sign of the Times. However she does sing it that way in the song.
PhilX
![]()
QuantumT wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 4:48 pm Well, here is the goddamn song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaeKpFuLvIY
So Lacey, what does it's a sign of the times mean to you?Lacewing wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 7:04 pmQuantumT wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 4:48 pm Well, here is the goddamn song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaeKpFuLvIY![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm not sure which is more funny... the choreography or the clothing.
Just seems like we're going through some huge shifts in attitudes and beliefs worldwide -- while simultaneously facing the fallout from generations of lop-sided control, thinking, and impact worldwide -- so pretty much everything going on right now (the whole "apparent" mad mess) is demonstrating what we've been, and the point we've gotten to, because of that.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 8:04 pm So Lacey, what does it's a sign of the times mean to you?
Surely, more than one person, place or thing can be a sign. For example, war zones can be a sign of our times. Internet porn could be a sign of the times, as well as world leaders and nuclear arms, swastikas and walls, ex-pats afloat on the Mediterranean or The Bachelorette.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βTue Aug 07, 2018 1:42 am Petula Clark made this song popular. What does it suggest to you?
PhilX
![]()
When were miniskirts gone? but I think wearing miniskirts is more a matter of the age of the woman than it is related to the stock market.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βThu Aug 09, 2018 6:50 pm Here's another one. With the rising stock markets, I expect the miniskirts to come back.
PhilX
![]()
I didn't mean it that way. Why would the age of the woman matter?thedoc wrote: βFri Aug 10, 2018 12:03 amWhen were miniskirts gone? but I think wearing miniskirts is more a matter of the age of the woman than it is related to the stock market.Philosophy Explorer wrote: βThu Aug 09, 2018 6:50 pm Here's another one. With the rising stock markets, I expect the miniskirts to come back.
PhilX
![]()