Page 1 of 3
Either
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 10:44 pm
by bahman
Experience is related to matter activity. Matter either creates experience or it creates qualia which this can be experienced by an experiencer. Which one do you think is the correct one? And why?
Re: Either
Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 11:07 pm
by Troll
One never comes to regard the monstrous branches of an old oak, holding up its bunched leaves wildly, almost in a berserker fashion, without seeing something that could be cut down for wood chips. The so-called quality of the tree is the support for getting at the thing that can be actively used. It is the flowing of what is as what it is. One can always hold back what is, and split it into the symbol of the active parts, the curvature, extension, colours, abstract shapes and so on. The raw form of the shapes, in the same way, is the flow of the being that allows us to guard over what we are to actively make use of, or, say, climb, in the case of the noble oak.
Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 1:29 am
by Impenitent
the thing in itself is unknowable
-Imp
Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 2:36 am
by Philosophy Explorer
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 1:29 am
the thing in itself is unknowable
-Imp
Yup
PhilX

Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:30 pm
by bahman
Troll wrote: βSat Apr 21, 2018 11:07 pm
One never comes to regard the monstrous branches of an old oak, holding up its bunched leaves wildly, almost in a berserker fashion, without seeing something that could be cut down for wood chips. The so-called quality of the tree is the support for getting at the thing that can be actively used. It is the flowing of what is as what it is. One can always hold back what is, and split it into the symbol of the active parts, the curvature, extension, colours, abstract shapes and so on. The raw form of the shapes, in the same way, is the flow of the being that allows us to guard over what we are to actively make use of, or, say, climb, in the case of the noble oak.
I don't understand how what you said is related to OP.
Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:33 pm
by bahman
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 1:29 am
the thing in itself is unknowable
-Imp
Well, perhaps one day one finds an argument for this.
Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:37 pm
by Impenitent
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:33 pm
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 1:29 am
the thing in itself is unknowable
-Imp
Well, perhaps one day one finds an argument for this.
perhaps one day Kant would suggest it
-Imp
Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:55 pm
by bahman
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:37 pm
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:33 pm
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 1:29 am
the thing in itself is unknowable
-Imp
Well, perhaps one day one finds an argument for this.
perhaps one day Kant would suggest it
-Imp
"the thing in itself is unknowable" refutes itself.
Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 11:21 pm
by Impenitent
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:55 pm
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:37 pm
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:33 pm
Well, perhaps one day one finds an argument for this.
perhaps one day Kant would suggest it
-Imp
"the thing in itself is unknowable" refutes itself.
actually, it doesn't
you have perceptions, nothing besides
are your perceptions of an external thing? prove it
-Imp
Re: Either
Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2018 11:43 pm
by bahman
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 11:21 pm
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:55 pm
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:37 pm
perhaps one day Kant would suggest it
-Imp
"the thing in itself is unknowable" refutes itself.
actually, it doesn't
you have perceptions, nothing besides
are your perceptions of an external thing? prove it
-Imp
Nothing cannot affect you. Therefore there is something.
Re: Either
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:43 am
by Impenitent
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 11:43 pm
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 11:21 pm
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 9:55 pm
"the thing in itself is unknowable" refutes itself.
actually, it doesn't
you have perceptions, nothing besides
are your perceptions of an external thing? prove it
-Imp
Nothing cannot affect you. Therefore there is something.
all you have is the impression, that does not prove externality...
-Imp
Re: Either
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:59 am
by bahman
Impenitent wrote: βMon Apr 23, 2018 1:43 am
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 11:43 pm
Impenitent wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 11:21 pm
actually, it doesn't
you have perceptions, nothing besides
are your perceptions of an external thing? prove it
-Imp
Nothing cannot affect you. Therefore there is something.
all you have is the impression, that does not prove externality...
-Imp
Do you believe that nothing can affect you?
Re: Either
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:42 pm
by Impenitent
bahman wrote: βMon Apr 23, 2018 1:59 am
Impenitent wrote: βMon Apr 23, 2018 1:43 am
bahman wrote: βSun Apr 22, 2018 11:43 pm
Nothing cannot affect you. Therefore there is something.
all you have is the impression, that does not prove externality...
-Imp
Do you believe that nothing can affect you?
"something" could be a hallucination...
-Imp
Re: Either
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:33 pm
by jayjacobus
bahman wrote: βSat Apr 21, 2018 10:44 pm
Experience is related to matter activity. Matter either creates experience or it creates qualia which this can be experienced by an experiencer. Which one do you think is the correct one? And why?
Qualia is the consciousness' reaction to a sense but a sense is a frame of reference for reality. This is why we have senses. We need references to understand reality. Neither does matter create experience. But it is the referrent(s) for the senses.
Re: Either
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:49 pm
by jayjacobus
jayjacobus wrote: βMon Apr 23, 2018 10:33 pm
bahman wrote: βSat Apr 21, 2018 10:44 pm
Experience is related to matter activity. Matter either creates experience or it creates qualia which this can be experienced by an experiencer. Which one do you think is the correct one? And why?
Qualia is the consciousness' reaction to a sense but a sense is a frame of reference for reality. This is why we have senses. We need references to understand reality. Neither does matter create experience. But it is the referrent(s) for the senses.
I didn't say that quite right. Let me restate the last two sentences. Events through the senses create experiences. Without events there won't be anything to experience and without senses there won't be any experiences to experience.