There Was/Is No Sacrifice
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 3:33 pm

.
You save yourself.
You create your own heaven or hell.
.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/

Knowledge is a justified belief.Science Fan wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 3:50 pm That's what the Taoist believe. I'm not sure why one has to refer to heaven or hell, two imaginary places though.
With the increase in knowledge, what we observed/percieve/etc., comes an increase in understanding the nature of the world and its inherent vanity and contradiction. This knowledge of contradiction, as a deficiency in reason, in turn reflects back to the individual as a form of "sorrow". (there is some german term for this I cannot remember). Sorrow as a deficiency of a joy ,which unifies the individual's emotional state (as joy is a result of internal and external congruency and structure conducive to the fruitful well being of the individual) has a "wounding" effect on the soul in the respect it pulls itself apart.
This "illusion" in itself is the limit of reality...to sum everything up.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 9:05 am Thanks for the well written clarification. I do understand how you've put this.
*
My thoughts ...
Knowledge is suffering on the human level.
But also, knowledge informs illusory life..in that there is not a 'someone' living life except as assumed, and the opposite is also true, there is 'no one' living life, and 'no one' is 'everyone', aka 'everything' aka' nothing'..and there lies the freedom to be, there is no sacrifice made, you are freedom in every moment, free to choose how you want to feel - be it happy or miserable. With Knowledge - come the opposites, so what ever you want, the opposite is also born, so becoming attached to one particular way of feeling brings suffering when the fear of losing that feeling is there also.
Attachment to things that are constantly changing from one moment to the next, and are not a solid state that we can keep tightly within our grasp, while thinking we can is our suffering...so in essence nothing stays, but the nothing itself, and that is the freedom right there...there's an energetic shift in perception into this ultimate freedom of letting go of attachments to things that are constantly changing, things that are unavailable to us, freedom is noticing what doesn't change - the centre of beingness where no outcome is expected or desired, it is here in that still centre of awareness lies the ultimate freedom that is always here right now being everything.
But this recognition of what never changes, is available to all of us, and not just for the one who truly masters the art of being, and yet it's not for everyone, obviously not everyone is strong enough to endure their own emptiness or stay with it without the urge to constantly fill that void up with things which is futile anyway, for that which is only and ever void can never be filled, and yet when the desire to stop filling that which cannot be filled is surrendered to, it is seen that this void is full to the brim with itself anyway, and that it is totally fulfilled in every moment.
.
When you win you lose, and when you lose you win. Any sacrifice is pure illusory..everything is you and nothing is you.
.
Dontaskme wrote: You save yourself.
You create your own heaven or hell..
Just to clarify, there is no ''separate you''. There is no you because there is no other than you.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 7:26 pmDontaskme wrote: You save yourself.
You create your own heaven or hell..Everywhere else you claim there is no 'You' or 'your'?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:24 amJust to clarify, there is no ''separate you''. There is no you because there is no other than you.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Tue Apr 17, 2018 7:26 pmDontaskme wrote: You save yourself.
You create your own heaven or hell..Everywhere else you claim there is no 'You' or 'your'?
So why are you telling yourself that their is no separate you? If their is "no" separation then what is seperation? If it is a lie, or a deficiency in truth, how can that be considering deficiency in itself is a form of seperation?
The one looking out of your eyes is the same one looking out of every living organisms eye.
The 'separate you' is an 'appearance' in oneness inseparable from it. No thing is separate from source. And source is not a thing.
When we refer to the separate I concept, we are talking about characters within the dream of separation, the dream dreamt by no one aka SELF without an object dreaming it is an object.
In the dream it appears the characters are the doers, but they are the action figures of doing, no thing is doing life, life is doing itself all alone, it is the mind within the human character that creates the assumed separate character, that then believes it is the doer, but characters appear as conceptual knowledge, and knowledge never did anything, knowledge only informs the illusory nature of a reality appearing as if by magic real when it's not..as the words are believed to be what they inform...see my ''how reality really is made of magic'' thread in the lounge - it explains how words which are really thoughts create the human world of things and others...that are not really there.
In the dream.. life can be heaven or hell, but that in which these ideas are arising, is neither heaven or hell, but the neutral space aka awareness in which the idea of heaven and hell is a dream arising in awareness.
.
.
''Separation'' is a ''known concept'' of consciousness the only knowing there is. It's an idea, a thought. Consciousness has never seen itself, it only knows itself by being itself. So concepts don't actually exist in and of them selves independent of the knower.
The problem occurs, in summarizing the above, if everything is strictly subjective and objectivity is strictly a deficiency in subjectivity, then the subjective is not unified because of the objective?Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:43 pm''Separation'' is a ''known concept'' of consciousness the only knowing there is. It's an idea, a thought. Consciousness has never seen itself, it only knows itself by being itself. So concepts don't actually exist in and of them selves independent of the knower.
So every time a word is spoken by consciousness that word is a concept known to consciousness only.
It's not a concept that knows it's a concept.
For example: a tree does not know it is a tree, therefore it is not a tree. A tree is a known image of consciousness which is imageless.
Consciousness has to be imageless for an image to appear just as a tv screen has to be blank and empty for the images to appear coherent and recognised and known, and just as the images on a tv screen are inseaparable from the screen, so too are known concepts inseparable from consciousness which is imageless. Rending the concepts nothing more than mirages or dream characters appearing as if they were real. But there is nothing behind an image but emptiness. So a tree is no thing treeing. Sounds weird, but that's how it is.
There is no other outside meaning other than what you personally perceive your reality to be. Words are just the perception of the perceiver which is empty consciousness. Objects are given names and those names are believed to exist as separate things but there is absolute nothing separating reality whatsoever except the word which is not any thing at all...appearing in the same not a thing, rendering knowledge an illusory appearance of not a thing..aka consciousness.
We've all got the same consciousness and we all project objects outside of our consciousness, these objects are conceptual images they have no reality in and of themselves separate from the projector. No object has ever been seen, all objects are known, never seen. No one is seeing, there is only seeing that has never been seen.
.