Actually, lots of evidence for reincarnation exists, but it is mostly people claiming it in sources. I don't buy into it, but then again, complex governemnts have existed based on this premise, such as the Tibetan succession for several high offices over hundreds of years, and it was stable, sorta enlightened in aspects in a era when other monarchies collapsed. Easy enough to disregard the validity of the concept (and I do), but disregarding it isn't the same as saying absolutely no chance for it.
For example, let's say a computer AI in the future becomes peculiarly attached to one of us in a few centuries. We have been long dead, but something we did or say intrigued us, and it began unearthing records about us.... old posts, when phone calls had been made, purchase history, places we lived, work, dated, married. Pictures, vacations, friends, every known nuance of interest. It buys the land you live on, walks the walk you walk. After a time, instead of just getting into your head, it becomes eerily like you, enough to the point it discovers through new habits acquired, that you left otherwise untraceable activities, such as a name carved into a tree off the trail on a mountain. It had no idea you traveled there, but was so into your mindset it just went where you went, looked at the tree you once looked at.
In simulating your desires, impulses, unconscious..... wouldn't you in a sense be reincarnated in it? The uncanny resurrection? I note the Dalai Lama doesn't believe in a full reincarnation of the soul, but the migration of the majority of some casual spirit thingy, a little is lost and gained each time, this pattern.
If your actions influences a tabula rasa in the future, in a sense, you reincarnate. Why do you think I'm always cautious with INTJ philosophers. Not because I'm obsessed with the mindset, but because I have a extra-communal sense of self imbedded in each one.... if I make a mistake in experience, I hope they avoid it too, as they are as good as I am, same reflexes and instincts in many cases, even if everything else is different. In a sense, they are me, but I am still my own very unique self.
This being said, it is preferable to leave Trixie trapped in the limbo of a hellish prospect of the cursed Nietzschean Eternal Return cause I don't think he actually read Dennent, just keeps saying it like we are supposed to be impressed he (supposedly) read a five hundred page book. Burnnnnnnnnnnnn, over and over in your many carnations. What ha ha ha ha!!!!!
