Page 1 of 5

ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm
by bobevenson
There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:41 pm
by Harbal
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!
I agree, bob, you have as much right to earn a living as everyone else.

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:41 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!
What's her name Bob?

PhilX

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:45 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!
You know this could put your mother out of work.

PhilX

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:23 pm
by bobevenson
Harbal wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:41 pm
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!
I agree, bob, you have as much right to earn a living as everyone else.
That line reminds me of an incident on Rush Street in Chicago, when I walked past a bar, and the late and great raunchy comedian Redd Foxx was doing his standup routine in a horseshoe bar (this was before he was ever on TV). A lady at the bar kept harassing him, and he finally said to her, "Why are you trying to keep me from earning a living, I wouldn't burn your bed!"

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:30 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
What are you talking about? Prostitution is perfectly legal.

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:35 pm
by bobevenson
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:30 pm What are you talking about? Prostitution is perfectly legal.
Not in the USA except Las Vegas, Nevada! And you don't think there's a crying need for the AEP?

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:09 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:35 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 10:30 pm What are you talking about? Prostitution is perfectly legal.
Not in the USA except Las Vegas, Nevada! And you don't think there's a crying need for the AEP?
And I should care why? God you yanks are so fucking arrogant. You need to get it through your thick heads that the US is not the default country of the planet.

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:26 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!
Wrong dum dum. Get acquainted with the commerce clause:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause

PhilX

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:29 pm
by Science Fan
So, according to you, a girl as young as 8, who wants to sell herself for sex, should be allowed to do so? The child is too young to consent, so this is at least one justifiable limitation against prostitution that government can help us with.

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:39 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
Science Fan wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:29 pm So, according to you, a girl as young as 8, who wants to sell herself for sex, should be allowed to do so? The child is too young to consent, so this is at least one justifiable limitation against prostitution that government can help us with.
To put it simply, Bob has cuckoo ideas that defy explanation which he can't justify.

PhilX

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:39 pm
by bobevenson
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:09 pm You need to get it through your thick heads that the US is not the default country of the planet.
It is too, and all the other countries are at-fault.

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:44 pm
by bobevenson
Philosophy Explorer wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:26 pm
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!
Wrong dum dum. Get acquainted with the commerce clause:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause

PhilX
Please, that's a corruption of individual freedom of choice in the pursuit of happiness!

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:47 pm
by bobevenson
Science Fan wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:29 pm So, according to you, a girl as young as 8, who wants to sell herself for sex, should be allowed to do so? The child is too young to consent, so this is at least one justifiable limitation against prostitution that government can help us with.
Jesus Christ, we're not talking about children, we're talking about consenting adults!

Re: ALL LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON PROSTITUTION SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY ABOLISHED

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:56 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote: Sun Jun 18, 2017 9:44 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 11:26 pm
bobevenson wrote: Sat Jun 17, 2017 9:34 pm There is absolutely no legitimate reason for the government to be involved in this free-market activity!
Wrong dum dum. Get acquainted with the commerce clause:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause

PhilX
Please, that's a corruption of individual freedom of choice in the pursuit of happiness!
Wrong again dum dum. It increases freedom of choice and it promotes the welfare of the people.

PhilX