For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
If anything, lawyers are known for logical thinking and wouldn't it be true that a lawyer would more readily understand another lawyer? Do you have any proof that our country has fared poorly under lawyers?bobevenson wrote:Lawyers are responsible for all the decisions leading up to the US Supreme Court. The last thing we need are more lawyers making the ultimate decisions. It doesn't take a law degree to understand the US Constitution.
Please, remember the OJ Simpson trial? "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!"Philosophy Explorer wrote:If anything, lawyers are known for logical thinking and wouldn't it be true that a lawyer would more readily understand another lawyer? Do you have any proof that our country has fared poorly under lawyers?bobevenson wrote:Lawyers are responsible for all the decisions leading up to the US Supreme Court. The last thing we need is more lawyers making the ultimate decisions. It doesn't take a law degree to understand the US Constitution.
Only a lawyer could come up with a great line like that (credit both Johnny Cochrane and F. Lee Bailey).bobevenson wrote:Please, remember the OJ Simpson trial? "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!"Philosophy Explorer wrote:If anything, lawyers are known for logical thinking and wouldn't it be true that a lawyer would more readily understand another lawyer? Do you have any proof that our country has fared poorly under lawyers?bobevenson wrote:Lawyers are responsible for all the decisions leading up to the US Supreme Court. The last thing we need is more lawyers making the ultimate decisions. It doesn't take a law degree to understand the US Constitution.
Your so-called great line does not belong in a court of law in front of a jury.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Only a lawyer could come up with a great line like that (credit both Johnny Cochrane and F. Lee Bailey).bobevenson wrote:Please, remember the OJ Simpson trial? "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!"Philosophy Explorer wrote:
If anything, lawyers are known for logical thinking and wouldn't it be true that a lawyer would more readily understand another lawyer? Do you have any proof that our country has fared poorly under lawyers?
Tell it to da judge.bobevenson wrote:Your so-called great line does not belong in a court of law in front of a jury.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Only a lawyer could come up with a great line like that (credit both Johnny Cochrane and F. Lee Bailey).bobevenson wrote: Please, remember the OJ Simpson trial? "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!"
Be thankful we have them. And I'm sure you would go running to one if you were having certain problems (note that a certain class do fight for your freedom to shoot off your mouth).bobevenson wrote:Right, another stupid lawyer!
Sounds like you hate British lawyers. Did you have any dealings with them? What makes British lawyers particularly bad?bobevenson wrote:“The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.”
- William Shakespeare, King Henry VI, Part 2
Have you met all the lawyers? How do you know this?bobevenson wrote:All lawyers are the scum of the Earth.
I'm a prophet.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Have you met all the lawyers? How do you know this?bobevenson wrote:All lawyers are the scum of the Earth.
Not acceptable proof in a court of law nor by scientists.bobevenson wrote:I'm a prophet.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Have you met all the lawyers? How do you know this?bobevenson wrote:All lawyers are the scum of the Earth.