For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Oh, no, Henry...his idea is MUCH better than that...it's that "the government," meaning the taxes YOU pay, will soak up all the costs of a glutted legal profession PLUS remove any cost to people -- whether genuine litigants or frivolous idiots -- for activating that system.henry quirk wrote:So, under your scheme, am I allowed to seek out, and pay for, my own lawyer, or (heaven forbid!) defend or serve myself?
If yes, then great.
If no, then how is your scheme any better than those promoted by the commie scum who people this forum?
In principle, you're right, but in practice it wouldn't work.bobevenson wrote:The legal system is one of the functions of government, and any expenses thereof are properly defrayed by the government. That means that the government must supply all the attorneys, and there are no filing expenses or charges of any kind to the people or businesses using the system.
In practice it would work perfectly because the AEP knows exactly how it should be handled. First of all, an independent government-appointed agency determines if an issue will even be accepted for adjudication. If accepted, neutral agency attorneys litigate the proceedings before a professional jury. You don't have biased lawyers paid for by opposing parties, and juries composed of every Tom, Dick and Harry off the street. All judicial decisions are automatically reviewed through an appeal system. The present system is a bad joke and a mockery of justice. And it doesn't matter how much the AEP system costs because you can't put a price tag on justice.Harbal wrote:In principle, you're right, but in practice it wouldn't work.bobevenson wrote:The legal system is one of the functions of government, and any expenses thereof are properly defrayed by the government. That means that the government must supply all the attorneys, and there are no filing expenses or charges of any kind to the people or businesses using the system.
bobevenson wrote:... before a professional jury. ...
Based on what criteria?
All judicial decisions are automatically reviewed through an appeal system. ...
That'll be with another 'professional jury' would it. What happened to the first one?
Well your country's certainly seems to be.The present system is a bad joke and a mockery of justice. ...
Oo! No, I think you'll find it really does matter when it comes to the voters voting for this fictional AEP of yours.And it doesn't matter how much the AEP system costs because you can't put a price tag on justice.
Do you normally write in a large font and in bold because of eye problems? Or some other reason? I ask because it comes across as if you are permanently angry, so if there is some other reason it would be a good idea to say, so people do not misunderstand your intention.bobevenson wrote:Please, take your 200 point type and shove it up your 300 point ass!
The only thing blind about him is his brain.Londoner wrote:Do you normally write in a large font and in bold because of eye problems? Or some other reason? I ask because it comes across as if you are permanently angry, so if there is some other reason it would be a good idea to say, so people do not misunderstand your intention.bobevenson wrote:Please, take your 200 point type and shove it up your 300 point ass!
Why don't you ask your stupid fucking question to Arising? And then feel free to ask me any stupid fucking question about this thread.Londoner wrote:Do you normally write in a large font and in bold because of eye problems? Or some other reason? I ask because it comes across as if you are permanently angry, so if there is some other reason it would be a good idea to say, so people do not misunderstand your intention.bobevenson wrote:Please, take your 200 point type and shove it up your 300 point ass!
Thank you for answering my question so clearly.bobevenson wrote:Why don't you ask your stupid fucking question to Arising? And then feel free to ask me any stupid fucking question about this thread.Londoner wrote:Do you normally write in a large font and in bold because of eye problems? Or some other reason? I ask because it comes across as if you are permanently angry, so if there is some other reason it would be a good idea to say, so people do not misunderstand your intention.bobevenson wrote:Please, take your 200 point type and shove it up your 300 point ass!
Whoosh! Zoom!! The irony bird has brought a jet engine!!!bobevenson wrote:Please, take your 200 point type and shove it up your 300 point ass!