Refugees in a world of tyranny, anarchism, and chaos.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 7:45 am
Refugees in a world of tyranny, anarchism, and chaos.
It is obvious that if Europe felt under obligation to give asylum to refugees they would not be left facing impossible odds in travelling to Europe, drowning at sea, or facing cold and disease in camps. Europe would be providing transport to bring them securely to safety. Albeit a pragmatic folly.
There will still be refugees in a future world founded on altruistic democracy, arising from natural disaster. But it may trusted these may be of manageable proportions for the world.
On the other hand virtual chaos creates a very different animal. With that part of the global non-society as approximates to altruism, under obligation to combat the source of any crisis, even at the risk of failure. Providing this does not prejudice the future of those altruist democracies.
Failing that solution, refugees need to be kept securely in camps close to their homelands, in their own region of the world, and provided with better mean for survival than is often the case at present. The situation we are in today.
The worst scenario is of large regions descending into chaos, war or otherwise, and the displacement of people reaching impossible proportions. The implications of that need not be spelled out.
If altruist democracies do not survive in good order then neither can altruist man.
It is obvious that if Europe felt under obligation to give asylum to refugees they would not be left facing impossible odds in travelling to Europe, drowning at sea, or facing cold and disease in camps. Europe would be providing transport to bring them securely to safety. Albeit a pragmatic folly.
There will still be refugees in a future world founded on altruistic democracy, arising from natural disaster. But it may trusted these may be of manageable proportions for the world.
On the other hand virtual chaos creates a very different animal. With that part of the global non-society as approximates to altruism, under obligation to combat the source of any crisis, even at the risk of failure. Providing this does not prejudice the future of those altruist democracies.
Failing that solution, refugees need to be kept securely in camps close to their homelands, in their own region of the world, and provided with better mean for survival than is often the case at present. The situation we are in today.
The worst scenario is of large regions descending into chaos, war or otherwise, and the displacement of people reaching impossible proportions. The implications of that need not be spelled out.
If altruist democracies do not survive in good order then neither can altruist man.