Philosophy Now Forum

Ok bob. That is funny.

Poor Donald! I'm beginning to feel sorry for him...but hopefully the expense of running and losing results in another tax deduction.

It's a totally sad nightmare that you poor bastards state-side have only these two poor cracker wasters to choose from. That is the one and only story. Of course its happening global.

bobevenson wrote:...from "Make America Great Again!" to "Make America Grope Again!"

That made me laugh out loud. Did you see that somewhere, or is it the result of one of your divinely-inspired auditory hallucinations?

See... if you made hats (just like his) with this slogan, you could make big bucks! More than any of your other dingdong ideas. But you better hurry! No sitting around for 30 years on this one.

Lacewing wrote:

bobevenson wrote:...from "Make America Great Again!" to "Make America Grope Again!"

That made me laugh out loud. Did you see that somewhere, or is it the result of one of your divinely-inspired auditory hallucinations?

See... if you made hats (just like his) with this slogan, you could make big bucks! More than any of your other dingdong ideas. But you better hurry! No sitting around for 30 years on this one.

It's already been done.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:It's already been done.

It figures that Bob didn't come up with something that immediately relevant and profitable.

bobevenson wrote:As you should know by now, I only come up with that which is divinely inspired.

Which has shown no meaning or value in this world, other than to stroke yourself.

bobevenson wrote:I'm not sure if that's just jealousy or if you have a problem with people stroking themselves.

Hmm... well, I can honestly say neither. So it must have something to do with the PUBLIC nature of your self-stroking that you bombard everyone with. Why do you need to repetitively make all your claims (often the same ones over and over) to an audience that clearly doesn't believe you or care? Is there no receptive audience ANYWHERE for you that you can focus on? That should tell you something.

bobevenson wrote:Let me ask you, do you think John on the isle of Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in 96AD had a receptive audience?

No... and probably for good reason. He was babbling incoherently about his psychedelic trip, claiming (AS MANY OTHERS WERE about themselves) that he was delivering the message of a god. It's such an old, old, worn out story role... that inexplicably continues on to this day... of so many people proclaiming their divine association and messages... blah, blah, blah... wanting everyone to publicly revere them for their self-pleasuring addiction (yank me, crank me, don't ya wanna spank me)!

C'mon Bob... you of all people... because you question all the claims and systems of the world... should be questioning your OWN intoxication! You are not immune. You are a drunkard. Why not just admit it? Why keep pretending that it's anything more than it actually is? Your greatest enlightenment would be to stop believing everything you think.

Lacewing wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Let me ask you, do you think John on the isle of Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in 96AD had a receptive audience?

No... and probably for good reason. He was babbling incoherently about his psychedelic trip, claiming (AS MANY OTHERS WERE about themselves) that he was delivering the message of a god.

Let's see, that was 1,920 years ago, but it became the final book of the Bible, and deservedly so, since it is the only book written by a divinely inspired prophet like me.

Philosophy Explorer wrote:And Boob has changed from hallucinations to visions.

A hallucination produced by divine intervention is a vision.