Philosophy Now Forum

Even BW can't top this one:

http://www.booooooom.com/2016/07/25/min ... k-of-fame/

PhilX

Ever watch the TV show Drugs, Inc?

Melchior wrote:Ever watch the TV show Drugs, Inc?

No I haven't. I can say that this won't work. Just a gimmick to get Trump votes.

PhilX

Does it really matter if he builds a wall? I'm sure there will be a door somewhere. Perhaps you could grow a walled garden, with ivy and nice climbing plants like sweet-pea.

Oh that's precious! Take a picture.

Amazing how ideology makes people so stupid. Of course walls matter. This is why special people are protected by walls. The POTUS is special. He and his family live behind many walls, some of them made of weapons. He and his family are protected because they are special. The rule writers have been saying U.S. citizens don’t need a wall on the Mexico border that empirical evidence shows will significantly boost the protection of the citizenry in many ways, which is the fundamental purpose of government. Should you and Phil visit the U.S. or live there know that you are not special enough for walls, like the special people. Your loss of your life is within acceptable parameters of loss. You know. Like eagles, though you are not eagles. Amazing someone would say that they are not an eagle as a rational presentation. Must be ideology.

Walker wrote:Oh that's precious! Take a picture.

Amazing how ideology makes people so stupid. Of course walls matter. This is why special people are protected by walls. The POTUS is special. He and his family live behind many walls, some of them made of weapons. He and his family are protected because they are special. The rule writers have been saying U.S. citizens don’t need a wall on the Mexico border that empirical evidence shows will significantly boost the protection of the citizenry in many ways, which is the fundamental purpose of government. Should you and Phil visit the U.S. or live there know that you are not special enough for walls, like the special people. Your loss of your life is within acceptable parameters of loss. You know. Like eagles, though you are not eagles.

Visit the US? I live here in the US fool. And loss of life naturally I can accept, not because you say so, but because it's part of life.

It seems you're still stuck on the eagles. Do you want to go back to the other thread to thrash it out some more?

PhilX

This is the hypocrisy of Wall-Deniers.

“Delegates to the Democratic National Convention are now protected from unwanted protesters by a giant double-wall border fence. The border fence was doubled to make sure people without proper documentation could not illegally enter the convention area.”

You see, they’re special. You’re not. You’re on the outside of the fence.

Walker wrote:This is the hypocrisy of Wall-Deniers.

“Delegates to the Democratic National Convention are now protected from unwanted protesters by a giant double-wall border fence. The border fence was doubled to make sure people without proper documentation could not illegally enter the convention area.”

You see, they’re special. You’re not. You’re on the outside of the fence.

Well you paranoid fucks live in walled communities, so you might as well wall your your whole country. Gotta keep all them marauding commies out eh?

Talking to your fantasy again. Look where that's gotten you. It's gotten you years of perfecting your idiocy.

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

Walker wrote:Oh that's precious! Take a picture.

Amazing how ideology makes people so stupid. Of course walls matter. This is why special people are protected by walls. The POTUS is special. He and his family live behind many walls, some of them made of weapons. He and his family are protected because they are special. The rule writers have been saying U.S. citizens don’t need a wall on the Mexico border that empirical evidence shows will significantly boost the protection of the citizenry in many ways, which is the fundamental purpose of government. Should you and Phil visit the U.S. or live there know that you are not special enough for walls, like the special people. Your loss of your life is within acceptable parameters of loss. You know. Like eagles, though you are not eagles.

Visit the US? I live here in the US fool. And loss of life naturally I can accept, not because you say so, but because it's part of life.

It seems you're still stuck on the eagles. Do you want to go back to the other thread to thrash it out some more?

PhilX

No. You hate eagles and think they should die for a fantasy. I don't. Nothing more to discuss as far I'm concerned, and your concerns are your own.

Walker wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

Walker wrote:Oh that's precious! Take a picture.

Amazing how ideology makes people so stupid. Of course walls matter. This is why special people are protected by walls. The POTUS is special. He and his family live behind many walls, some of them made of weapons. He and his family are protected because they are special. The rule writers have been saying U.S. citizens don’t need a wall on the Mexico border that empirical evidence shows will significantly boost the protection of the citizenry in many ways, which is the fundamental purpose of government. Should you and Phil visit the U.S. or live there know that you are not special enough for walls, like the special people. Your loss of your life is within acceptable parameters of loss. You know. Like eagles, though you are not eagles.

Visit the US? I live here in the US fool. And loss of life naturally I can accept, not because you say so, but because it's part of life.

It seems you're still stuck on the eagles. Do you want to go back to the other thread to thrash it out some more?

PhilX

No. You hate eagles and think they should die for a fantasy. I don't. Nothing more to discuss as far I'm concerned, and your concerns are your own.

Hate eagles? Moi? You're definitely a looney. Didn't I suggest you should set up a sanctuary for them since you like them so much?

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote: Hate eagles? Moi? You're definitely a looney. Didn't I suggest you should set up a sanctuary for them since you like them so much?

PhilX

He doesn't care about eagles, he just doesn't want a windfarm anywhere near his house.

My opinion is he loves the eagles which colors his judgement. Next he'll say the government is prejudiced against the eagles. Fine birds, but doesn't warrant how Walker keeps going at it.

PhilX

Mr. Trump, tear down this wall!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tear_down_this_wall!

(So much for giving advice...)

Philosophy Explorer wrote:My opinion is he loves the eagles which colors his judgement. Next he'll say the government is prejudiced against the eagles. Fine birds, but doesn't warrant how Walker keeps going at it.

PhilX

You say you like eagles.

You advocate killing eagles for no good reason.

Ergo: please don't like me.

See the value of logic?