Page 1 of 1

Why Should I Be Good?

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 12:26 pm
by Philosophy Now
The following readers’ answers to this central philosophical question each win a random book.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/63/Why ... _I_Be_Good

Re: Why Should I Be Good?

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 5:54 pm
by Nick_A
This is one of those questions that a person is either open or closed to. Often the last thing wanted on a philosophy forum is consideration. it is considered demeaning. It has taken years of educational indoctrination to be pronounced worthy of sticking ones nose in the air high enough to prove philosophical superiority. But for those wondering why a person should be good, consider Jacob Needleman's book "Why Can't We Be Good."

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1113 ... We_Be_Good_

Why Can't We Be Good?

by Jacob Needleman

The widely respected social philosopher embarks on his most gripping and broadly appealing work, asking the ultimate question of human nature: Why do we repeatedly violate our most deeply held values and beliefs?

For all our therapies, resolutions, self-help programs, and the vast religious and ethical literature available to men and women today, we return again and again to the same limiting and predictable behaviors, vowing to do better "next time."

And far beyond the travails of our everyday existence-although sometimes intruding upon it with a ghastly shock-we witness a world twisted in conflict and warfare in which religious systems are continually used to justify slaughter. For sensitive people everywhere, the question resounds: Why can't we be good?

After nearly forty years of weighing humanity's deepest dilemmas-working in settings ranging from university and high school classrooms to corporate offices and hospitals-bestselling author, philosopher, and religious scholar Jacob Needleman presents the most urgent, deeply felt, and widely accessible work of his career. In Why Can't We Be Good? Needleman identifies the core problem that therapists and social philosophers fail to see. He depicts the individual human as a being who knows what is good, yet who remains mysteriously helpless to innerly adopt the ethical, moral, and religious ideas that are bequeathed to him.

In his jarring depiction of this most misunderstood of dilemmas, Needleman takes the reader through various settings and case studies: a college classroom, where students of all ages and backgrounds agonize to define goodness in an era marked by relativism and fundamentalism; a chilling psychological experiment from a generation earlier that reveals the capacity for brutality that lurks within us all-and our inability to see it; ancient stories from Rabbinic Judaism and mystical Christianity where, possibly, esoteric schools have left fragments of their own deep inner understanding of humanity's predicament and how to begin addressing it; and the words of Socrates, which lay bare the problems of the human psyche while hinting at a missing element that would serve to instruct us not merely on that which is good, but on how to commence our own efforts toward becoming the kind of men and women we are capable of being.

Steely-eyed, yet hopeful, Needleman provides ideas, and even exercises, that can start to show us the largeness of this problem-the problem of our inability to be good-and the precious early steps toward struggling with it. Here is one of the great philosophical considerations of our era, crafted in a manner that speaks to the needs of every sensitive person.
Yes there is an interview on this question on youtube for those who prefer videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcpQr9ohaww

Re: Why Should I Be Good?

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2016 6:05 pm
by HexHammer
Loooooong talkative nonsense and babble post.

Author makes a wrong distinctions between a child's and an adults definition of being morally good. As I see it, there is little difference, since both can act by moral guidelines, but also out of fear of punishment, so the author is a freggin half wit, approaching the topic with a simpleminded view.

This is the usual low standard for this magasin.