Fishnets and suspenders.
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:57 pm
For KKKristian hypocrite Immanuel Cannot and his boyfriend shitapraya.
The Nazi stance on abortion and homosexuality parallels the hypocrisy of the conservative kristian lobby of the present day. The Nazis publicly opposed abortion, except when it suited them; thousands of jews and gypsies had enforced abortions under the Nazi regime. Kristian right-wingers oppose abortion--except when it suits them; Republican politician and outspoken ‘pro-lifer’ Scott Des Jarlais is a prime example. The Nazis were motivated by racial hatred, while kristian 'pro-lifers' are motivated by hatred of women in general. Both are about controlling women.
The 'pro-life' lobby is only concerned with legal abortion. It doesn't care that banning abortion simply increases dangerous illegal abortions. It has been proven that outlawing abortion makes little or no difference to the actual abortion rate--in fact countries with the strictest anti-abortion laws have among the highest rates of abortion. Women in those countries will either use backstreet abortionists, or if they can afford it, travel to a country that has liberal abortion laws.
This apparent anomaly makes sense, since the anti-abortion movement is about being anti-women, not pro-embryo. Anti-abortion goes hand in hand with anti-contraception--another seeming anomaly that defies logic to any rational person, until you understand the underlying motive.
The Nazis publicly hated homosexuality, yet at the same time many of the top Nazis were openly gay amongst themselves. I've lost count of the number of outspoken kristian gay-haters who have been caught literally with their pants down.
Anyone would have to be blind not to see the similarities between these two political movements. Hypocrisy is hypocrisy, whatever label you wish to adopt.
You also have to wonder why 'pro-lifers' don't protest at IVF clinics. IVF clinics destroy unwanted embryos all the time, yet IVF doctors are not threatened, they don’t live in fear of their lives. Perhaps one embryo has more value than another to 'pro-lifers'. Perhaps creating ten embryos, with the full expectation that nine of them will be surplus to requirements and unceremoniously flushed or burned, is somehow more noble than a woman exercising her freedom of choice by having an unwanted embryo removed for personal reasons.
'Pro-lifers' don't mind IVF embryos being flushed down the drain, yet they can't stand the thought of the stem cells from those embryos being used for medical research--research that could save many of the human lives that they claim to care about so deeply.
Could it be that the 'pro-life' movement is far more interested in controlling women's bodies than saving embryos? That IVF is acceptable because it doesn't involve sex, and pro-lifers are primarily concerned with what women get up to in their bedrooms, especially unmarried 'sinful' women?
Dear 'pro-lifers', kindly take your double-standards, self-righteousness, inconsistencies, bibles and hypocrisy and shove them up your collective arse.
The Nazi stance on abortion and homosexuality parallels the hypocrisy of the conservative kristian lobby of the present day. The Nazis publicly opposed abortion, except when it suited them; thousands of jews and gypsies had enforced abortions under the Nazi regime. Kristian right-wingers oppose abortion--except when it suits them; Republican politician and outspoken ‘pro-lifer’ Scott Des Jarlais is a prime example. The Nazis were motivated by racial hatred, while kristian 'pro-lifers' are motivated by hatred of women in general. Both are about controlling women.
The 'pro-life' lobby is only concerned with legal abortion. It doesn't care that banning abortion simply increases dangerous illegal abortions. It has been proven that outlawing abortion makes little or no difference to the actual abortion rate--in fact countries with the strictest anti-abortion laws have among the highest rates of abortion. Women in those countries will either use backstreet abortionists, or if they can afford it, travel to a country that has liberal abortion laws.
This apparent anomaly makes sense, since the anti-abortion movement is about being anti-women, not pro-embryo. Anti-abortion goes hand in hand with anti-contraception--another seeming anomaly that defies logic to any rational person, until you understand the underlying motive.
The Nazis publicly hated homosexuality, yet at the same time many of the top Nazis were openly gay amongst themselves. I've lost count of the number of outspoken kristian gay-haters who have been caught literally with their pants down.
Anyone would have to be blind not to see the similarities between these two political movements. Hypocrisy is hypocrisy, whatever label you wish to adopt.
You also have to wonder why 'pro-lifers' don't protest at IVF clinics. IVF clinics destroy unwanted embryos all the time, yet IVF doctors are not threatened, they don’t live in fear of their lives. Perhaps one embryo has more value than another to 'pro-lifers'. Perhaps creating ten embryos, with the full expectation that nine of them will be surplus to requirements and unceremoniously flushed or burned, is somehow more noble than a woman exercising her freedom of choice by having an unwanted embryo removed for personal reasons.
'Pro-lifers' don't mind IVF embryos being flushed down the drain, yet they can't stand the thought of the stem cells from those embryos being used for medical research--research that could save many of the human lives that they claim to care about so deeply.
Could it be that the 'pro-life' movement is far more interested in controlling women's bodies than saving embryos? That IVF is acceptable because it doesn't involve sex, and pro-lifers are primarily concerned with what women get up to in their bedrooms, especially unmarried 'sinful' women?
Dear 'pro-lifers', kindly take your double-standards, self-righteousness, inconsistencies, bibles and hypocrisy and shove them up your collective arse.