Page 1 of 3
~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:27 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.
...................................................What they all said...
.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 10:26 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.
Well, they said nothing.
The 10 active posters upon this excellent forum said nothing because they did not know what to say.
There was no directive path and the tone here upon this thread. And the overall gestalt at the PhilosophyNow Forums lately. is to jump upon a fellow member criticize, breakdown, and critique EVERY SINGLE WORD of another poster.
Not to embrace fellow posters overall thought process or conscious perspective.
Don't totally allow the weak & foolish to ruin every thread here.
Speak-up you fellow observers. SPEAK YOUR MIND.
Even though, admittedly, every word, every thought we express is half wrong.
Don't let that stop you.
.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 12:31 pm
by Harbal
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
Well, they said nothing.
The 10 active posters upon this excellent forum said nothing because they did not know what to say.
.
It's not that I didn't know what to say, it's just that I find it impossible to say anything to you that isn't abusive. I was just trying to behave myself, surely I deserve some credit for that. Tosser! (it really is impossible).
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 12:49 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
Well, they said nothing.
The 10 active posters upon this excellent forum said nothing because they did not know what to say.
.
I know what to say.
I say "THIS thread is as empty as your head and requires no comment at all."
Try and think it through.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 1:37 pm
by Arising_uk
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
Well, they said nothing.
The 10 active posters upon this excellent forum said nothing because they did not know what to say.
Aw! See, this is what I get for trying to be nice. As what I was going to post in answer to the title was
"Please go post your gnu-guff somewhere else".
There was no directive path and the tone here upon this thread. ...
Hence nothing was said and so no reply needed. 
And the overall gestalt at the PhilosophyNow Forums lately. ...
Do you even know what "Gestalt" is supposed to mean? Or do German words just sound deep to you. If so try "Zeitgeist" or maybe even "Weltanschauung".
... is to jump upon a fellow member criticize, breakdown, and critique EVERY SINGLE WORD of another poster.
Trying to use the words in their commonly understood meaning might help but all-in-all what you are complaining about is an important method of Philosophy, i.e. critique and I can well understand why a gnu might find this irksome.
Not to embrace fellow posters overall thought process or conscious perspective.
By embrace do you mean accept contradictions? If so then you should not be posting upon a Philosophy forum .
Don't totally allow the weak & foolish to ruin every thread here.
But allow contradictions and falsehoods to go unchallenged? Definitely not suited to a Philosophy forum.
Speak-up you fellow observers. SPEAK YOUR MIND.
And prepare to be critiqued and actually respond to it and if one is truly here to philosophize then change one's thoughts and beliefs in the face of accurate critique. Doesn't mean you have to lose them, just amend them to deal with the critique. It's called Philosophy and philosophizing.
Even though, admittedly, every word, every thought we express is half wrong.
Is that like being a bit pregnant?
Don't let that stop you.[/size]
I agree, just be prepared to amend one's thought to deal with the wrong parts and don't thikn it some attempt to subdue you, as it's just Philosophy and if engaged with correctly will refine and strengthen one's thoughts and beliefs.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 1:51 pm
by Harbal
Bill, you maybe a sorry specimen, yourself, but you certainly seem to bring out the best in others.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 3:17 pm
by Lacewing
So, Bill... it sounds like...
> You want people here to respond to whatever you say
> You want them to agree or feel commonality with what you say
> You will not respond to questions asking for clarification or any type of justification
> If people point out inconsistencies, falsehoods, projections, or abusive behavior, you will think that they are trying to subdue you
Is this correct? Or are you going to ignore answering this too?
Honestly, why would people here be interested in meeting those conditions above for anyone?
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:20 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
Just to start off with, you're misdirected in each of your initial assumptions.
...so, we would assume that your conclusions are brought about by a colossal a priory misunderstanding.
Good day, young lady.
.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:43 pm
by Lacewing
Bill Wiltrack wrote:...you're misdirected in each of your initial assumptions
Are you aware of the things you say and do, BEYOND the moment that you say and do them?
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:26 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
Yeah. I'm going to stick with and double-down upon my earlier post:
Just to start off with, you're misdirected in each of your initial assumptions.
...so, we would assume that your conclusions are brought about by a colossal a priory misunderstanding.
Good day, young lady.
...as I said, good day sweetheart.
.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:57 pm
by Arising_uk
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
... a priory misunderstanding.
Now this is just too funny upon a philosophy forum.
Or did I misunderstand and you were referring to your rehabilitation clinic?
Or even the monastery you should attend to rediscover your faith in a 'God'.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 5:59 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Lacewing wrote:Bill Wiltrack wrote:...you're misdirected in each of your initial assumptions
Are you aware of the things you say and do, BEYOND the moment that you say and do them?
I think Bill drinks a lot.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:00 pm
by Harbal
Lacewing wrote:
Are you aware of the things you say and do, BEYOND the moment that you say and do them?
Just as you wouldn't expect a cat to bark or a chicken to quack, you shouldn't expect to get any kind of sense out of Billy the buffoon, he's not that kind of animal. Don't waste your time on him, young lady.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:02 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Arising_uk wrote:Bill Wiltrack wrote:.
... a priory misunderstanding.
Now this is just too funny upon a philosophy forum.
Or did I misunderstand and you were referring to your rehabilitation clinic?
Or even the monastery you should attend to rediscover your faith in a 'God'.
I thought he meant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priory_(band), not
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Priory_(play), or was it ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priory ???
Hence the misunderstanding.
Re: ~ What They All Said ~
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2016 6:02 pm
by Harbal
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
I think Bill drinks a lot.
But what is he drinking, alcohol alone couldn't do that to a person.