Page 1 of 1
I don't care if you're a wild one
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:58 pm
by Green
Imagine a planet with its peoples who are concerned with "true" eugenics, now imagine that dogma dictates reasoning in not only social structure but the scholastic, would this reality lay positive (earth reality as is) the NWO propaganda or negatively, as far as philosophical descent? Would it even matter, and if so then what does that say about political affiliation, pretending there is a legitimate correlation?
Re: I don't care if you're a wild one
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:52 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.
Could you expand upon this?
I think you've got something here but the thesis is unclear to the over 150 viewers thus far...including me.
.
Re: I don't care if you're a wild one
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 2:07 pm
by Terrapin Station
When people write stuff like the initial post in this thread, do they really read it back to themselves and say, "Oh yeah, that's easily intelligible to people who aren't already inside my head. The ideas are clear. It's grammatically sound. It reads like a magazine article"?
Re: I don't care if you're a wild one
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 2:58 pm
by TSBU
Terrapin Station wrote:When people write stuff like the initial post in this thread, do they really read it back to themselves and say, "Oh yeah, that's easily intelligible to people who aren't already inside my head. The ideas are clear. It's grammatically sound. It reads like a magazine article"?
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:06 pm
by henry quirk
"Imagine a planet with its peoples who are concerned with "true" eugenics"
Okay...I'm imagining it...know what I see?
A world filled with 'breeds' of humans not unlike breeds of dogs or cats or cows or whatever...a world of sanctioned genetic monsters.
Better stop that shit before it starts.
Stick with the tried and true: mutts and mongrels.