Page 1 of 1

The PN game

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 1:41 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX

Re: The PN game

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 3:08 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX
No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.

Re: The PN game

Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 3:15 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX
No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.
Nobody wins. Because everybody's a winner. And that's because everybody thinks he or she posts something that is smart and worthwhile.

PhilX

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 7:34 am
by Dalek Prime
I'll take door number 3, Monty.

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 7:38 am
by Philosophy Explorer
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX
No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.
BTW HR, has anyone ever called you a village idiot?

PhilX

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 10:25 am
by marjoram_blues
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX
It's not the only game in PN town. However, if you want to focus on the boring banning game, do you think there should be a limit to the period of play. And how many replays of the same game, by the same individual should be allowed?

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 10:35 am
by Philosophy Explorer
marjoram_blues wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX
It's not the only game in PN town. However, if you want to focus on the boring banning game, do you think there should be a limit to the period of play. And how many replays of the same game, by the same individual should be allowed?
It's interesting you brought up limits. Somebody did that in basketball a long time ago (with a clock buzzer) and the result was the game scores went up. The same may happen here if your proposal were adopted leading to more flaming, banning etc. Quite a game.

PhilX

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 10:40 am
by marjoram_blues
PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off :shock:

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 10:43 am
by Philosophy Explorer
marjoram_blues wrote:PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off :shock:
How about a round Robin?

PhilX

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 11:04 am
by marjoram_blues
Philosophy Explorer wrote:
marjoram_blues wrote:PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off :shock:
How about a round Robin?

PhilX
Of beer, Batman?

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 11:11 am
by Philosophy Explorer
marjoram_blues wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:
marjoram_blues wrote:PhilX
Crikey, perhaps we should have a tournament area, all roped off :shock:
How about a round Robin?

PhilX
Of beer, Batman?
OK Batgirl

PhilX

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 11:51 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Here's how it works. Somebody tries to post as much bs as the crowd can stand before flaming, banning, etc. occurs. The winner is the one who's most successful at this.

PhilX
No.
You win if you post something that is smart and worthwhile. Since you keep posting shit, you fail the game everytime.
Nobody wins. Because everybody's a winner. And that's because everybody thinks he or she posts something that is smart and worthwhile.

PhilX
Actually that's the most (only) intelligent thing I've seen you post. :D

Re: The PN game

Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 12:00 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Nobody wins. Because everybody's a winner. And that's because everybody thinks he or she posts something that is smart and worthwhile.

PhilX
Actually that's the most (only) intelligent thing I've seen you post. :D
You caught me on my bad day.

PhilX