Graffito Snail
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 9:41 pm
http://metro.co.uk/2008/06/01/graffiti- ... on-163486/
Had to share this. Snail painted with tag graffito.
Had to share this. Snail painted with tag graffito.
How is it wrong? And who does it insult?Pluto wrote:It's wrong and an insult
reminds me of a favourite book
http://www.victorianweb.org/decadence/huysmans/5.html
https://artbeatsexpress.com/videos/139541Impenitent wrote:oh sure, tag a snail....
try tagging a cheetah or something...
-Imp
Ridiculous!!!Pluto wrote:It's wrong because it defaces (in a cheap way) a living organism ('s home) without its consent or knowledge. And it's an insult to the organism called 'snail' and to nature in general.
No snails are easier, because they move slowly, and are not likely to kill you. They are also in plentiful supply and are likley to be seen by other members of the public.Impenitent wrote:oh sure, tag a snail....
try tagging a cheetah or something...
-Imp
I can improve on this. How would the snail know it's home has been defaced?Hobbes' Choice wrote:Ridiculous!!!Pluto wrote:It's wrong because it defaces (in a cheap way) a living organism ('s home) without its consent or knowledge. And it's an insult to the organism called 'snail' and to nature in general.
As the snail is not competent to give consent of have knowledge, it is of no consequence.
If you eat vegetable, then you are personally responsible for the deaths of thousands of snails.
Snails are killed in their millions each year by farmers, and gardeners. I see no problem giving them five minutes of fame.
This is not an improvement. I made a statement, you only ask a question.Philosophy Explorer wrote:I can improve on this. How would the snail know it's home has been defaced?Hobbes' Choice wrote:Ridiculous!!!Pluto wrote:It's wrong because it defaces (in a cheap way) a living organism ('s home) without its consent or knowledge. And it's an insult to the organism called 'snail' and to nature in general.
As the snail is not competent to give consent of have knowledge, it is of no consequence.
If you eat vegetable, then you are personally responsible for the deaths of thousands of snails.
Snails are killed in their millions each year by farmers, and gardeners. I see no problem giving them five minutes of fame.
PhilX
And a very telling question, except maybe to you.Hobbes' Choice wrote:This is not an improvement. I made a statement, you only ask a question.
As usual I'm way ahead of you.Philosophy Explorer wrote:And a very telling question, except maybe to you.Hobbes' Choice wrote:This is not an improvement. I made a statement, you only ask a question.
PhilX
You must be - you can't hear me.Hobbes' Choice wrote:As usual I'm way ahead of you.Philosophy Explorer wrote:And a very telling question, except maybe to you.Hobbes' Choice wrote:This is not an improvement. I made a statement, you only ask a question.
PhilX
That's how I like it.Philosophy Explorer wrote:You must be - you can't hear me.Hobbes' Choice wrote:
As usual I'm way ahead of you.
PhilX