Philosophy Now Forum

In the US it certainly is. Both are belief systems, yet excuses are more readily made when it comes to religion as this article explains:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... hilosophy/

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:In the US it certainly is. Both are belief systems, yet excuses are more readily made when it comes to religion as this article explains:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... hilosophy/

PhilX

If you pulled the theological rules or tenets out of Christianity that have a corresponding philosophy in secular law, you would find that most Americans are secularists and not (real Christian) as they are following secular laws and are definitely not advocating for biblical law. They would not dare as stoning fornicators is a crime in the U.S.

Sure, most Christians will give religion top priority (verbally) but they are just being hypocritical which is a religious staple. This is obvious when one recognizes that they are never advocating for biblical law to be the law of the land.

Compare that to the more devout Muslims who are always trying to get Sharia put as the law of the land.

To put a dead theology from an obviously barbaric p**** of a God ahead of a live theology that responds to inquiry would be a crime against humanity.

Regards
DL

Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

HexHammer wrote:Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

Not a tard and I'm not a reject like Hex.

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

Not a tard and I'm not a reject like Hex.

PhilX

If you're jumping to conclusions, blame your philosophical reasoning, not philosophy itself.

Dalek Prime wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

Not a tard and I'm not a reject like Hex.

PhilX

If you're jumping to conclusions, blame your philosophical reasoning, not philosophy itself.

You sound like a Chinese fortune cookie (and that's a conditional statement you made so there's nothing to blame - you've been skipping your Philosophy 101 classes to go to the library to play video games).

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:You sound like a Chinese fortune cookie (and that's a conditional statement you made so there's nothing to blame - you've been skipping your Philosophy 101 classes to go to the library to play video games).

PhilX

And you sound like an imp of Apple corporation about to tell us how AWESOME the latest iphone is like the biggest sap in the tree of shit.

attofishpi wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:You sound like a Chinese fortune cookie (and that's a conditional statement you made so there's nothing to blame - you've been skipping your Philosophy 101 classes to go to the library to play video games).

PhilX

And you sound like an imp of Apple corporation about to tell us how AWESOME the latest iphone is like the biggest sap in the tree of shit.

And you sound like the asshole you really are. Are you another side of Hex?

PhilX

Who pissed in your Corn Flakes this morning, Phil? I was addressing Hex, not you. Quit being so fucking oversensitive.

Dalek Prime wrote:Who pissed in your Corn Flakes this morning, Phil? I was addressing Hex, not you. Quit being so fucking oversensitive.

Sorry about that Dalek. My phone blocked out your name at the top and I only saw Hex"s name when I responded.

I find it interesting that even a plainly philosophical thread such as this gets abuse from users just because it has a link. It shows you how small-minded some people get.

PhilX

I figured it was an oversight. No worries.

Dalek Prime wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

Not a tard and I'm not a reject like Hex.

PhilX

If you're jumping to conclusions, blame your philosophical reasoning, not philosophy itself.

..and a tard like DP..tard of tards!

Oh, ouch... ouch ouch...

HexHammer wrote:Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

Theology jumps to invisible and imaginary Gods but philosophy can only jump to logic and reason. That is why it is superior to theology. It forces thought instead of the escape into fantasy.

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL

So many forget.

Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

Regards
DL