Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:When Procter & Gamble built its new twin towers in Cincinnati, the four sides at the top of each tower were engraved with large circles awaiting to be finished with the picture of its famous moon-and-stars logo. Unfortunately, the actions of Bob the Baptist caused P&G to discard the logo forever, and now visitors to the Queen City see only meaningless designs within the circles.

So they replaced a beautiful, historic logo with an ugly new one because some insane arsehole spread rumours that the old one was 'satanic'? What a fucking arsehole that person must have been, and P and G were arseholes for taking any notice of some deranged freak. And no bob, you are not a prophet. You are a nut-job who should be locked away in a padded cell, WITHOUT access to a computer.

bobevenson wrote:Why don't you check out http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/infamous-logo.pdf, and tell me why P&G didn't take legal action against me. They sued a retired guy in some trailer park for a million dollars for writing something about the logo in his little newsletter. But they never even asked me to stop distributing "That Infamous Logo." Do you know why? They conspired with the Cincinnati division of the FBI to conduct an illegal investigation of me, but Bob the Baptist was able to see through their little scam. Why don't you contact P&G for an explanation of their gutless and nefarious behavior?

You are a nutter, that's all I need to know.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Why don't you check out http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/infamous-logo.pdf, and tell me why P&G didn't take legal action against me. They sued a retired guy in some trailer park for a million dollars for writing something about the logo in his little newsletter. But they never even asked me to stop distributing "That Infamous Logo." Do you know why? They conspired with the Cincinnati division of the FBI to conduct an illegal investigation of me, but Bob the Baptist was able to see through their little scam. Why don't you contact P&G for an explanation of their gutless and nefarious behavior?

You are a nutter, that's all I need to know.

You don't have the balls you were born with, do you?

bobevenson wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Why don't you check out http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/infamous-logo.pdf, and tell me why P&G didn't take legal action against me. They sued a retired guy in some trailer park for a million dollars for writing something about the logo in his little newsletter. But they never even asked me to stop distributing "That Infamous Logo." Do you know why? They conspired with the Cincinnati division of the FBI to conduct an illegal investigation of me, but Bob the Baptist was able to see through their little scam. Why don't you contact P&G for an explanation of their gutless and nefarious behavior?

You are a nutter, that's all I need to know.

You don't have the balls you were born with, do you?

Sounds like you are just an all-round bloody nuisance. Look at the logo now. Happy?

bobevenson wrote:No, I'm not happy they discarded their logo. It's a symbol of what "The Ouzo Prophecy" is about. But you know something, those lying bastards denied they were going to put the logo on the twin towers.

So what if they did? Isn't that their FREEDOM to do so, the FREEDOM that you are always driveling on about? And don't flatter yourself. They probably changed the logo because morons (and you have more than your fair share) would associate it with islam.

From a quick check I turned up this story which doesn't mention the things that Bob brought up:

http://www.businessinsider.com/pg-puts- ... ons-2013-5

The story mentions 13 stars which I think stands for the 13 colonies before the US started. It also shows the number 666 and a horn and the story mentions a tie to satanism. In spite of this, P&G was a successful company for many years.

PhilX

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:

bobevenson wrote:No, I'm not happy they discarded their logo. It's a symbol of what "The Ouzo Prophecy" is about. But you know something, those lying bastards denied they were going to put the logo on the twin towers.

So what if they did? Isn't that their FREEDOM to do so, the FREEDOM that you are always driveling on about? And don't flatter yourself. They probably changed the logo because morons (and you have more than your fair share) would associate it with islam.

P&G lied when they said they never intended to put the logo on the twin towers, which was later confirmed by the company that built the towers. All of this occurred long before any concerns over Islam.

Philosophy Explorer wrote:From a quick check I turned up this story which doesn't mention the things that Bob brought up:

http://www.businessinsider.com/pg-puts- ... ons-2013-5

The story mentions 13 stars which I think stands for the 13 colonies before the US started. It also shows the number 666 and a horn and the story mentions a tie to satanism. In spite of this, P&G was a successful company for many years.

I'm sorry, but you're talking to somebody who knows more about this subject than anybody else on Earth. By the way, the logo didn't start with barge workers painting a star on P&G boxes, it was a crude cross as confirmed by P&G promotional material, which has since been deleted by the company, but is shown at the top of "That Infamous Logo."

bobevenson wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:From a quick check I turned up this story which doesn't mention the things that Bob brought up:

http://www.businessinsider.com/pg-puts- ... ons-2013-5

The story mentions 13 stars which I think stands for the 13 colonies before the US started. It also shows the number 666 and a horn and the story mentions a tie to satanism. In spite of this, P&G was a successful company for many years.

I'm sorry, but you're talking to somebody who knows more about this subject than anybody else on Earth. By the way, the logo didn't start with barge workers painting a star on P&G boxes, it was a crude cross as confirmed by P&G promotional material, which has since been deleted by the company, but is shown at the top of "That Infamous Logo."

Forgive me Bob for doubting your sincerity along with your knowledge on this matter.

PhilX

Bob
Have you ever wondered why a 'satanic' organization would hesitate to eliminate an irritant whose disappearance would cause no fuss?

Arising_uk wrote:Bob
Have you ever wondered why a 'satanic' organization would hesitate to eliminate an irritant whose disappearance would cause no fuss?

You could ask the same question about the FBI agent who called me up right after 8:00am, after P&G called him at about my letter to P&G's president linking P&G to an illegal conspiracy with the FBI. The FBI's foolproof investigation of me had blown up in P&G's face, and the psychotic-sounding telephone call from the FBI agent sounded like he was in a straitjacket at a mental facility.