Page 1 of 7

Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:32 pm
by bobevenson
Marriage is merely a cultural phenomenon that should convey no legal prerogatives. The term should not even be used by the government.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 3:49 pm
by Melchior
Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 4:20 pm
by bobevenson
Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 4:46 pm
by Melchior
bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.
It certainly is!

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 5:43 pm
by bobevenson
Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.
It certainly is!
It is not; the only proper function of government is social integration as I have discussed in detail on many occasions!

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:01 pm
by Melchior
bobevenson wrote: It is not; the only proper function of government is social integration as I have discussed in detail on many occasions!
Social integration? What the fuck is that?

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:01 pm
by bobevenson
As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:41 pm
by Melchior
bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:47 pm
by bobevenson
Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.
Jesus Christ, are you fucking nuts or just plain stupid???

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:03 pm
by Melchior
bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running onto each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall.
That makes no sense. Learn English, you moron.
Jesus Christ, are you fucking nuts or just plain stupid???

No, you are!

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:28 pm
by bobevenson
Maybe the writing was too small for you to read. Is this better?

As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall, a very dumb wall, indeed.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:20 pm
by Melchior
bobevenson wrote:Maybe the writing was too small for you to read. Is this better?

As I have said many times before, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. I won't elaborate since it's like talking to a wall, a very dumb wall, indeed.

That's not what 'social integration' means, dumbass! The term you want is 'civil order'.

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 11:50 pm
by bobevenson
You're telling a prophet the definition of words? Good luck, motherfucker!

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:46 am
by Melchior
bobevenson wrote:You're telling a prophet the definition of words? Good luck, mother fucker!
Yes, I am, because you are clueless!

Re: Marriage should have no legal significance.

Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:53 am
by Harbal
Melchior wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Melchior wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property.
That is not a proper function of government, my friend.
It certainly is!
He's right. It is.