Philosophy Now Forum

International Monetary Fund (IMF) Dual Currency agreement for European Racial Partition. Two (2) speed Europe coming. http://t.co/JKUPcFQZzG

https://twitter.com/IC3BlackEurope/stat ... 5475640320

It is the only way for peace.

bobevenson wrote:Sounds like a bunch of racial crap that makes no sense at all. Furthermore, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank serve no useful purpose and only steal money from other people to finance their stupid programs.

What programs of the International Monetary Fund do you think are stupid?

What programs of the World Bank do you think are stupid?

Think carefully answer intelligently.

Is it true that the European Union must accommodate Greece for the greater good of all Europeans, as a whole, worldwide, at all costs?


See for yourself:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-33228119

Brit Dems wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Sounds like a bunch of racial crap that makes no sense at all. Furthermore, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank serve no useful purpose and only steal money from other people to finance their stupid programs.

What programs of the International Monetary Fund do you think are stupid? What programs of the World Bank do you think are stupid?[/size]

These organizations only help to maintain the economy of corrupt and tyrannical governments.

bobevenson wrote:

Brit Dems wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Sounds like a bunch of racial crap that makes no sense at all. Furthermore, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank serve no useful purpose and only steal money from other people to finance their stupid programs.

What programs of the International Monetary Fund do you think are stupid? What programs of the World Bank do you think are stupid?[/size]

These organizations only help to maintain the economy of corrupt and tyrannical governments.

OK.

So you believe the IMF is beyond reform?

bobevenson wrote:That organization can't be reformed. It's based based on taking my tax money and spending it on despots and tyrants. But it doesn't matter what country gets the money, it is an improper allocation of taxes, taking money from Peter to pay Paul.

Is it not true that, that is precisely what Government is for?

Is it not for the greater good?

Brit Dems wrote:

bobevenson wrote:That organization can't be reformed. It's based based on taking my tax money and spending it on despots and tyrants. But it doesn't matter what country gets the money, it is an improper allocation of taxes, taking money from Peter to pay Paul.

Is it not true that, that is precisely what Government is for?

Is it not for the greater good?

No, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. It is improper for the government to take money from one person and give it to another.

bobevenson wrote:

Brit Dems wrote:

bobevenson wrote:That organization can't be reformed. It's based based on taking my tax money and spending it on despots and tyrants. But it doesn't matter what country gets the money, it is an improper allocation of taxes, taking money from Peter to pay Paul.

Is it not true that, that is precisely what Government is for?

Is it not for the greater good?

No, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. It is improper for the government to take money from one person and give it to another.

What if taking money from one person and giving it to another person was part of the regulatory system needed to stop "people running into each other"?

Think carefully.

bobevenson wrote:

Brit Dems wrote:

bobevenson wrote:That organization can't be reformed. It's based based on taking my tax money and spending it on despots and tyrants. But it doesn't matter what country gets the money, it is an improper allocation of taxes, taking money from Peter to pay Paul.

Is it not true that, that is precisely what Government is for?

Is it not for the greater good?

No, the only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running into each other. It is improper for the government to take money from one person and give it to another.

What if taking money from one person and giving it to another person was part of the regulatory system needed to stop "people running into each other"?

Think carefully.

bobevenson wrote:No, I'm talking about the government forcibly taking money from you and giving it to me because it likes my sob story.

If the Government accepts you as a member of the society that is being governed, and me as outside that society, that action is justified by the Government.

Satisfied?

bobevenson wrote:It is never proper for the government to take money from you to give to me for any reason under the sun, whether we live in the same country or different countries.

Does not the money actually belong to the Government?

The Government must regulate the movement of the money it prints in order to maintain the value of the money it prints.

Does that make sense?