Page 1 of 16

All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:32 pm
by bobevenson
The 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required. Well, my friends, that needs to be changed to no bail shall be required since bail of any kind is discrimination against the poor!

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:31 pm
by Wyman
bobevenson wrote:The 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required. Well, my friends, that needs to be changed to no bail shall be required since bail of any kind is discrimination against the poor!
You'll find that all but the stupidist criminals will decline to show up for trial (half of them don't as it is).

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:39 pm
by bobevenson
Wyman wrote:You'll find that all but the stupidest criminals will decline to show up for trial (half of them don't as it is).
That's a different issue altogether, and in case you've forgotten, a person is not a criminal until he has been convicted by a jury of his peers in a court of law!

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:54 pm
by Wyman
bobevenson wrote:
Wyman wrote:You'll find that all but the stupidest criminals will decline to show up for trial (half of them don't as it is).
That's a different issue altogether, and in case you've forgotten, a person is not a criminal until he has been convicted by a jury of his peers in a court of law!
If you think about it, they are completely intertwined issues. I said the criminals will not show up for court. The innocent will show up without bail.

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:09 am
by Brit Dems
Wyman wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Wyman wrote:You'll find that all but the stupidest criminals will decline to show up for trial (half of them don't as it is).
That's a different issue altogether, and in case you've forgotten, a person is not a criminal until he has been convicted by a jury of his peers in a court of law!
If you think about it, they are completely intertwined issues. I said the criminals will not show up for court. The innocent will show up without bail.

What would the innocent do if they had been framed and have not got the evidence that they need?

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:53 pm
by bobevenson
Wyman wrote:I said the criminals will not show up for court. The innocent will show up without bail.
What is your point? My point is that an innocent poor person who hasn't been convicted of any crime can't get out of jail prior to a trial!

Discriminatory Taxation Must Be Abolished!

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:15 pm
by bobevenson
The only proper form of taxation is a single tax on property, property being defined as anything with intrinsic market value. However, since discriminatory taxation represents a misallocation of resources, the market value of a whorehouse must be taxed at the same rate as an orphanage, and a bottle of liquor at the same rate as a bottle of milk. Anything less is an abominable intrusion of government into our lives.

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 2:23 pm
by Wyman
bobevenson wrote:
Wyman wrote:I said the criminals will not show up for court. The innocent will show up without bail.
What is your point? My point is that an innocent poor person who hasn't been convicted of any crime can't get out of jail prior to a trial!
There is no incentive to come to court if you think you'll get locked up. How do you propose to ensure a defendant's appearance in court?

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 2:39 pm
by bobevenson
Wyman wrote:There is no incentive to come to court if you think you'll get locked up. How do you propose to ensure a defendant's appearance in court?
That's not my problem, your problem or the government's problem. Denying bail is convicting somebody for a possible crime (not showing up for trial) before it even happens!

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:00 pm
by Wyman
bobevenson wrote:
Wyman wrote:There is no incentive to come to court if you think you'll get locked up. How do you propose to ensure a defendant's appearance in court?
That's not my problem, your problem or the government's problem. Denying bail is convicting somebody for a possible crime (not showing up for trial) before it even happens!
You get the money back when you show up; so you are not being convicted of anything. Ability to pay as well as the serious of the alleged crime and strength of the evidence are taken into account when setting bond (you don't want to let the crazy mass murderer who was caught red-handed out pending trial) You don't really know anything about bail, do you? Just admit it.

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:00 pm
by bobevenson
You don't know shit about bail, my friend, and less about the U.S. Constitution!

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:04 pm
by bobevenson
Wyman wrote:You get the money back when you show up.
What if you don't have any money, you goddamn idiot?

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:10 pm
by Wyman
bobevenson wrote:
Wyman wrote:You get the money back when you show up.
What if you don't have any money, you goddamn idiot?
There are several options. An unsecured bond is one where no money needs to be put up, but if you don't show, then you are liable for the set amount. There are signature bonds which are like the above, but you can't be released unless someone else signs for you - sometimes as a co-guarantor
and sometimes not. For minor crimes, people are usually released on their own recognizance until they don't show up - then bail is set. Some surety companies post the bond under an agreement where the defendant makes monthly payments to them, with very little to nothing up front.

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:13 pm
by Melchior
To be charged with a crime of a certain nature a certain threshold of probable guilt is already crossed. Depending on the nature of the crime with which someone is charged, it is not unreasonable to keep such persons in confinement if they seem to be a flight risk, or to demand bail.

Re: All Bail Should Be Unconstitutional

Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:20 pm
by bobevenson
Wyman wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Wyman wrote:You get the money back when you show up.
What if you don't have any money, you goddamn idiot.
There are several options. An unsecured bond is one where no money needs to be put up, but if you don't show, then you are liable for the set amount. There are signature bonds which are like the above, but you can't be released unless someone else signs for you - sometimes as a co-guarantor
and sometimes not. For minor crimes, people are usually released on their own recognizance until they don't show up - then bail is set. Some surety companies post the bond under an agreement where the defendant makes monthly payments to them, with very little to nothing up front.
That's a bunch of crap! There are thousands upon thousands of people sitting in jail because they can't make bail, and it's our rotten, filthy, godforsaken government lawmakers who are responsible for this outrageous state of affairs, and who would be behind bars themselves under an AEP regime!