Page 1 of 1

flat-out wrong

Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 5:29 am
by Pluto
flat-out wrong

Whenever the above is used it is used to hide its opposite

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/white-ho ... 90246.html

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n10/seymour-m- ... -bin-laden

Re: flat-out wrong

Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 7:41 am
by Pluto
This interview is a good example of how language is used to establish legitimacy or to persuade those watching of the interviewee's believability.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adsdn26vJ4E


He’s misfired on this one

Another, carol is… (referring to news anchor by name)

None of it adds up

What’s true isn’t new and what’s new isn’t true

Makes no sense at all

They would’ve had to been lying for years, and you know we live in an open society

When there is a conspiracy like Watergate, it fails a lot of common sense tests

Re: flat-out wrong

Posted: Mon May 18, 2015 11:20 am
by Pluto