Page 1 of 4

~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 12:26 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.



As you may already know I will be voting for the first female to be nominated BY ANY PARTY for the upcoming US 2016 Presidential elections.

If a woman is not nominated by any party I WILL NOT BE VOTING.

Actually, after viewing the list below...I have a hard time imagining the Republican Party nominating a woman.

Matter of fact, I don't see the Republican party nominating ANYTHING BUT a lily-white male.


Top 10 Shocking Attacks from the Republicans' War on Women:


1) Republicans not only want to reduce women's access to abortion care, they're actually trying to redefine rape. After a major backlash, they promised to stop. But they haven't yet. Shocker.

2) A state legislator in Georgia wants to change the legal term for victims of rape, stalking, and domestic violence to "accuser." But victims of other less gendered crimes, like burglary, would remain "victims."

3) In South Dakota, Republicans proposed a bill that could make it legal to murder a doctor who provides abortion care. (Yep, for real.)

4) Republicans want to cut nearly a billion dollars of food and other aid to low-income pregnant women, mothers, babies, and kids.

5) In Congress, Republicans have a bill that would let hospitals allow a woman to die rather than perform an abortion necessary to save her life.

6) Maryland Republicans ended all county money for a low-income kids' preschool program. Why? No need, they said. Women should really be home with the kids, not out working.

7) And at the federal level, Republicans want to cut that same program, Head Start, by $1 billion. That means over 200,000 kids could lose their spots in preschool.

8) Two-thirds of the elderly poor are women, and Republicans are taking aim at them too. A spending bill would cut funding for employment services, meals, and housing for senior citizens.

9) Congress just voted for a Republican amendment to cut all federal funding from Planned Parenthood health centers, one of the most trusted providers of basic health care and family planning in our country.

10) And if that wasn't enough, Republicans are pushing to eliminate all funds for the only federal family planning program. (For humans. But Republican Dan Burton has a bill to provide contraception for wild horses. You can't make this stuff up).







.........................................................
Image






.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:24 am
by David Handeye
hey Bill, what about Democrats?

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:15 pm
by David Handeye
Hey Bill, I've just read on Italian newspapers that tomorrow Hillary Clinton will announce her rush for The White House, are you gonna vote for her?

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:51 pm
by bobevenson
Bill Wiltrack wrote:If a woman is not nominated by any party I WILL NOT BE VOTING.
Of course, if a woman is not nominated by any party, there will be one less moron in the voting booth.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:23 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.


I haven't heard anything about Hillary Clinton as yet but, as I stated before, I will not vote in the upcoming 2016 Presidential elections for the first time in my life...unless there is at least one woman nominated for President.

It doesn't matter which party, I will vote for the first woman nominated by ANY party.

I hold out hope for the Republican party as well as ALL OTHER PARTIES.








.........................................................
Image






.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:05 pm
by bobevenson
I guess you'll be voting for the dyke, huh? You know, the one who erases official government emails on her private server.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:17 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.




..................................................
Image





I'm not that political at all right now.


Who is it that you are referring to?





.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:22 pm
by bobevenson
The white dyke in the blue dress.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 8:23 pm
by David Handeye
Is she dyke? No, can't believe it, mmmh

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 8:59 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.


I just Googled, Women Presidential Candidates 2016 Blue Dress -



This is what came-up:


....................................Image



Don't know that much about her...are you SURE she is lesbian?

...I mean, she looks like she very well could be but please give me a link or some sort of proof. If you can't provide a link you probably should not be accusing her of being a dyke - as you say.






.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:26 pm
by David Handeye
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.

I haven't heard anything about Hillary Clinton as yet but, as I stated before, I will not vote in the upcoming 2016 Presidential elections for the first time in my life...unless there is at least one woman nominated for President.



.
Haven't you? Web is full of comments, especially about "Hitlery" Clinton. This is one by Ed: «All we really knew about Obama, when he first ran, was that he was a black Senator from ILL. We knew little of his political worth. Hillary however is different, we know she lied and withheld information during the Watergate Investigation which got her fired as a lawyer in the investigation. We all know what she did in Libya which cost the lives of Americans and we know about the illegal emails. Are we going to trust her to run this country?», so Bill, are you gonna trust?
Another one by Bill (guess it's not you..) "Not now. Not ever. No qualifications. Lies. Lies. Lies.
She allowed 4 tax paying Americans be murdered while she went to bed; then she had the nerve to say, "What difference does it make?!"
Would it have made a difference if those four people were any of the following: her daughter Chelsea, her husband Bubba, the current POTUS Soetoro, her BFFs Chuck Schumer, Eric Holder, Nancy Pelosi, or how about Gennifer Flowers or Monica Lewinsky?
Only an idiot would vote for her for anything other than Most Likely To Help Continue The Current Downfall of America "

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:02 pm
by bobevenson
Bill Wiltrack wrote:If you can't provide a link you probably should not be accusing her of being a dyke - as you say.
Come on, her own husband once said, "She's been with more women than I have." Check the Internet for quotes on Hillary's lesbianism.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:27 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.


Just think America is ripe for a woman President. I don't care who it is...whatever party the first woman nominee is with doesn't matter to me.




........................................................
.Image


Doesn't even matter to me if she is a dyke...as you say.


.

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 12:20 am
by bobevenson
Bill Wiltrack wrote:Doesn't even matter to me if she is a dyke...as you say.
How about the fact that she's a devious bitch???

Re: ~ Republicans' War on Women ~

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 1:29 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.





................................................
Image


Again, not positive that this girl is a devious bitch or a dyke. Perhaps you should stop with the personal attacks and wait to see her position on some of the issues.

Kind-of like listen BEFORE you speak.






.