Page 1 of 1
Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:51 am
by Philosophy Explorer
Worthless or worthwhile? Discuss
PhilX
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:10 am
by marjoram_blues
'Discuss' - is this to be a conversation, a debate, an essay...or 'all/none of the above'?
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:20 pm
by thedoc
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Worthless or worthwhile? Discuss
PhilX
Yes, it is. Now if you want some discussion, state a position or opinion.
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:19 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
Marjoram, all of the above as long as it applies to the topic at hand.
Doc, I see philosophy as being worthwhile (primary example, government). But there are times where I see it as nitpicking (e.g. trivial arguments).
PhilX
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:54 pm
by marjoram_blues
PhilX - I only have time for a few words. Whole threads have been given over to discuss such.
If philosophy 'nitpicks' it might be in the sense of clarifying meaning. Then, that is fine. It is always worthwhile to clear out some mental cobwebs. Defining terms is important to prevent cross-talk and misunderstandings. Sometimes meaning is deliberately distorted by use of equivocation.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/equivoqu.html
'Worthless or worthwhile' - that depends on the type of philosophy undertaken and what you find valuable in it or want to get out of it. Could be that there is a little bit of worthwhile hiding under the seemingly worthless...
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 7:04 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
marjoram_blues wrote:PhilX - I only have time for a few words. Whole threads have been given over to discuss such.
If philosophy 'nitpicks' it might be in the sense of clarifying meaning. Then, that is fine. It is always worthwhile to clear out some mental cobwebs. Defining terms is important to prevent cross-talk and misunderstandings. Sometimes meaning is deliberately distorted by use of equivocation.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/equivoqu.html
'Worthless or worthwhile' - that depends on the type of philosophy undertaken and what you find valuable in it or want to get out of it. Could be that there is a little bit of worthwhile hiding under the seemingly worthless...
I avoid defining terms because that tends to limit discussion. I prefer to let the context define the meaning of a word or phrase (so far I haven't ran into problems in this area).
Anything worthless, as you indicated, can lead to something worthwhile (I did worthless selling for a few years until my eyes opened up wide). Do not be afraid to make mistakes because then we may learn the truth.
PhilX
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:26 pm
by bergie15
No, I do not think philosophy is nitpicking. It is just a way to understand what is going on around us. Maybe some think that it is, but I don't think that it is.
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 1:53 pm
by GreatandWiseTrixie
How can one even say "nitpicking"? There is nothing of substance to even pick at?
Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2015 1:09 am
by Blaggard
Well yeah what's wrong with nit picking anyway? Philosophy is that surely or it is nothing...

Re: Is philosophy nitpicking?
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:23 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
Hi, I'm Blaggard...the things people say that are complete bullshit.
...............................................................
.