Philosophy Now Forum

Yep relitivly very few people can say that money dosnt own there arse. Can love and money get along cos at the end of the day one or the other makes the world go around for you.

Computer is the only addiction I need. Bare minimum for rent and food, nothing else really.

Doesn't matter what your sexual preference is. Men are just as high maintance as women. Always whining about the latest game, manwhores blow 50k on fancy car upgrades that will become outdated in a few years. Stupid is as stupid does.

People say cigs are addicting but I say creative endevours and music are much more addicting. People are weak minded, cling to booze, cigs, and meat-eating at the expense of those around them. My only weakness is creativity. It seems people these days are addicted to non-creativity, the non-act of passivity.

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: Computer is the only addiction I need. Bare minimum for rent and food, nothing else really.

Mustn't cost you very much to live, mooching off mom and dad all the time.

thedoc wrote:

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: Computer is the only addiction I need. Bare minimum for rent and food, nothing else really.

Mustn't cost you very much to live, mooching off mom and dad all the time.

The docwatson when I said your deductions about me were wrong, I meant all of them.

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote:

thedoc wrote:

GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: Computer is the only addiction I need. Bare minimum for rent and food, nothing else really.

Mustn't cost you very much to live, mooching off mom and dad all the time.

The docwatson when I said your deductions about me were wrong, I meant all of them.

Keep telling yourself that, someday you might actually be right. Like when you're actually old enough to move out and live on your own, but I forget you actually need to earn a living then, - Oh well so much for that idea.

Doc wrote:

Like when you're actually old enough to move out and live on your own, but I forget you actually need to earn a living then, - Oh well so much for that idea.

If this is the case, aren't you being rather juvenile with your petty retorts.

Go play with your Thomas the Tank engine.

reasonvemotion wrote:Doc wrote:

Like when you're actually old enough to move out and live on your own, but I forget you actually need to earn a living then, - Oh well so much for that idea.

If this is the case, aren't you being rather juvenile with your petty retorts.

Go play with your Thomas the Tank engine.

I loved the Thomas show when I was a kid, and both fat conductors. You know, when you stop and think about it, trains really do seem like they have faces. It's part of the appeal, kind of secretly embedded in your subconscious, kind of like why people are attracted to monuments and holes in the ground in videogames, because they are sexual objects. Trains also represent the process of logic and deductive reasoning, trains represent the process of the mind itself, just watch conjunction junction and it will all make sense. Deductive reasoning is a trait that hardly anyone has, believing they can deduce like sherlock but end up being really derailed and far from the truth.

reasonvemotion wrote:Doc wrote:

Like when you're actually old enough to move out and live on your own, but I forget you actually need to earn a living then, - Oh well so much for that idea.

If this is the case, aren't you being rather juvenile with your petty retorts.

Go play with your Thomas the Tank engine.

"Reply in Kind", I tend to post a response that is on the level of the post being responded to. Post something civil on a topic that is of interest to me and I'll "reply in Kind". Most people, like me, can lower themselves to reply to a less than civil post, but some people, like Trixie, already at the bottom, find it impossible to raise their standards.

Thedoc is this conscience. Awareness of the self by the self.

thedoc wrote:

reasonvemotion wrote:Doc wrote:

Like when you're actually old enough to move out and live on your own, but I forget you actually need to earn a living then, - Oh well so much for that idea.

If this is the case, aren't you being rather juvenile with your petty retorts.

Go play with your Thomas the Tank engine.

"Reply in Kind", I tend to post a response that is on the level of the post being responded to. Post something civil on a topic that is of interest to me and I'll "reply in Kind". Most people, like me, can lower themselves to reply to a less than civil post, but some people, like Trixie, already at the bottom, find it impossible to raise their standards.

Right, which is who follow me around with your mysognist male tactics derailing every thread with slut shaming and off topic insults. It's plain to see really, you even post one-liners that have nothing to do with the thread topic at all. You are half of the reason females don't take philosophy seriously, because there's so many old men like you bobbing about.

Like Trixie I need a computer and books also for I am an eternal student though if I had to choose just the one
it would be books. I have few overheads so can live quite cheaply without it impacting up on my quality of life
But I do require mental stimulation however for the acquisition of knowledge is my raison d etre. Otherwise it
would have no meaning so while waiting for death I actually have something worthwhile to do to pass the time

"Reply in Kind", I tend to post a response that is on the level of the post being responded to. Post something civil on a topic that is of interest to me and I'll "reply in Kind". Most people, like me, can lower themselves to reply to a less than civil post, but some people, like Trixie, already at the bottom, find it impossible to raise their standards.

No Doc, you are very apt at slinging the mud and if it gets too sticky you shift blame and post "I reply in kind", this on a philosophy forum, fencing sitting is not acceptable.

Lift your game Doc.

I am with Trixie on this one.

Trixie wrote:

I loved the Thomas show when I was a kid, and both fat conductors. You know, when you stop and think about it, trains really do seem like they have faces. It's part of the appeal, kind of secretly embedded in your subconscious, kind of like why people are attracted to monuments and holes in the ground in videogames, because they are sexual objects. Trains also represent the process of logic and deductive reasoning, trains represent the process of the mind itself, just watch conjunction junction and it will all make sense. Deductive reasoning is a trait that hardly anyone has, believing they can deduce like sherlock but end up being really derailed and far from the truth.

That explains it. The charisma of Thomas.

Does money own my arse?

I am ever vigilant of the destruction and unhappiness it can cause, if one is without it.

So yes, money does own my arse.

reasonvemotion wrote:Does money own my arse?

I am ever vigilant of the destruction and unhappiness it can cause, if one is without it.

So yes, money does own my arse.

It's not so much green paper itself that causes it, but people's similar attitudes of putting value on it. It is the people's inaction that allow the forces of mother nature to devour you. For mother nature will punish you if you do not daily stick to a certain regimen of narrow rules, constantly feeding your body and staying within a narrow temperature range as part of her ridiculous game. We call this game "life", and strange as it is people seem to praise this absurd game.

I myself don't care for the pictures of Andrew Jackson on the bills, but what do you expect from a planet that celebrates Christopher Columbus as a hero.