Page 1 of 1
Frederick Copleston's A History of Philosophy - good?
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:13 am
by lukasecho
I was thinking of dipping into some of Copleston's volumes to fill in some gaps - is it a reasonable substititute to fill in gaps without reading the primary texts? say for Malebranche or Leibniz? or the whole Scholastics period?
A History of Philosophy is an eleven-volume history of Western philosophy written by English Jesuit priest Frederick Charles Copleston
Re: Frederick Copleston's A History of Philosophy - good?
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 2:03 am
by Impenitent
you can be familiar with someone's summary of someone else's work, someone's translation of someone else's work or you can be familiar with the work itself...
-Imp
Re: Frederick Copleston's A History of Philosophy - good?
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 2:22 am
by tbieter
Cop is good, but read the greats in primary. Cop's memoir is a bore.
Re: Frederick Copleston's A History of Philosophy - good?
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 7:29 am
by Breath
lukasecho wrote:I was thinking of dipping into some of Copleston's volumes to fill in some gaps - is it a reasonable substititute to fill in gaps without reading the primary texts? say for Malebranche or Leibniz? or the whole Scholastics period?
A History of Philosophy is an eleven-volume history of Western philosophy written by English Jesuit priest Frederick Charles Copleston
Copleston was a Jesuit, and that is readily apparent in his work. The title of his magnum opus is a bit of a misnomer, because as far as Freddie was concerned, only Western philosophy counts as philosophy. Nevertheless, his History of Philosophy is a
great work, written by someone who clearly understands the development of "western" thinking.
Breath