Divine math
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 11:40 pm
I assume that most of you believe that mathematics is eternal, timeless. Therefore math should "pay" even before the beginning of our Universe (before BB). If you accept that before BB was only the "Future", other phase of reality (see my theory, please), then mathematics should be in the "Future" somehow contained. In this context, it is not unreasonable to see the future as the realm of ideas, maybe empire of God (excuse me if I'm wrong).
Along with advancing ages we can watch as math penetrates into "our" universe. In the beginning was the Word said. Possible Byte, maybe bit. Spoken or written. In each case it was some (reproducible) structure. The reproducibility assumes memory, a discrete medium. It is not generally possible to accept an increasing of "Mathematics / information / structure" without rising / crystallization / condensation of memory media (and physical space) .
Euclid certainly did not have smaller brain than e.g. Euler (about order). Sure, Euler had for his (imaginary) work greater "Information / structure". (:Just as the miner mined real energy as mathematician mined imaginary energy:)
Along with advancing ages we can watch as math penetrates into "our" universe. In the beginning was the Word said. Possible Byte, maybe bit. Spoken or written. In each case it was some (reproducible) structure. The reproducibility assumes memory, a discrete medium. It is not generally possible to accept an increasing of "Mathematics / information / structure" without rising / crystallization / condensation of memory media (and physical space) .
Euclid certainly did not have smaller brain than e.g. Euler (about order). Sure, Euler had for his (imaginary) work greater "Information / structure". (:Just as the miner mined real energy as mathematician mined imaginary energy:)