Philosophy Now Forum

QM says that a particle can be in two places simultaneously. A black hole (aside from what Stephen Hawking says) won't let anything out, not even light nor photons which seems to contradict QM.

Maybe there is more to black holes besides Hawking's radiation (I'm aware it's been hypothesized that our universe is a black hole which begs the question: black hole inside of what in this case?)

Just sharing some thoughts.

PhilX

QM does not say that two particles can be in the same place simultaneously, it says that a particle cannot be in any one place probably speaking if it is measured, being as it's wave like also, so it's measure is disturbed by a ripple of energy that it would take to measure it.

I have a lot of respect for Stephen Hawking but his whole idea that black holes really exist, or that they exhibit any properties if they do is all conjecture, which is something we tend to forget when a genius is involved in science. End of the day though Stephen Hawking hasn't got a noble prize, and he wont unless he proves it.

If we take it that we are in a blackhole and all the other blackholes that we see are really just part of the one black hole which is the one we are in. We could call the black hole we are in nonlocality so we are in side a spooky blackhole. There is only one spooky black hole and we are in it. This explains how spooky action at a distance works. So there we go then universe solved in an instant.ha

You should change non locality to "your mum" when you use it in a post, it would make as much sense that way as it does when you use it in an erm post, no offence.

What are you banging the wide and fat hammer of sport on about?

Blagsy for one of such knowledge as your self naivety in some departments supprises me. God the creator is nonlocality. So if black holes exist they are representations of nonlocality. Spooky action shows us this nonlocality in action across its self at any distance because distance is illusion in terms of omni present nonlocality.