Philosophy Now Forum

Could it be that death is a part of quantum mechanics. Death here being the singlularity field that quantum mechamics takes place inside of. So life qm takes place inside death which is a nothing singularity.

jackles wrote:Could it be that death is a part of quantum mechanics. Death here being the singlularity field that quantum mechamics takes place inside of. So life qm takes place inside death which is a nothing singularity.

In general terms I would say that there is a problem here. You don't find singularities mentioned in quantum theory and there is a very good reason for this. Explanations supplied by Relativity don't marry with with quantum mechanics when it comes to the micro level. Relativity does well at the macro level, but fails at the micro level.

But there is hope, people such as Hameroff say there is such a thing as a quantum soul. Is this what you are looking for?

Yes well more or less ginkgo. I am pointing out here that death is the end of nothing as something . And that nothing plays its part in quntum physics. And nothing is the relativity between moving objects. So that nothing is the common as death as nonlocality. Death is nonlocality the mover.

jackles wrote:Could it be that death is a part of quantum mechanics. Death here being the singlularity field that quantum mechamics takes place inside of. So life qm takes place inside death which is a nothing singularity.

I see that you're taking the effort to improve your grammar. Nice!

But how could death be a singularity field, when it is the opposite of life, and equates to nothingness?

jackles wrote:Yes well more or less ginkgo. I am pointing out here that death is the end of nothing as something . And that nothing plays its part in quntum physics. And nothing is the relativity between moving objects. So that nothing is the common as death as nonlocality. Death is nonlocality the mover.

There's no zero or nothing in quantum mechanics, there are no infinities either, nor are there in relativity; those things we leave to Buddha the Pope or Confucius as concepts no one can explain in science as it applies to something that exists. QM and relativity agree up to a point: the devil is in the details.

Blaggard wrote:

jackles wrote:Yes well more or less ginkgo. I am pointing out here that death is the end of nothing as something . And that nothing plays its part in quntum physics. And nothing is the relativity between moving objects. So that nothing is the common as death as nonlocality. Death is nonlocality the mover.

There's no zero or nothing in quantum mechanics, there are no infinities either, nor are there in relativity; those things we leave to Buddha the Pope or Confucius as concepts no one can explain in science as it applies to something that exists. QM and relativity agree up to a point: the devil is in the details.

Yes, when it comes to quantum mechanics there is no zero to infinity.

www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

As far as quantum physics goes the partical thats in super position is in a no spin up or down neutrality. There for the superposition or hoste state of the super position can be seen as nothing or zero. And its this nothing or zero hoste state superposition that I believe is the unmoving consciouse root of all events and is the death state of the brain .superposition and superego being indistinguishably the same nonlocality.so the nonmoving super ego survives brain death as nothing.unmoving consciousness always being independent of any brain. Love and the superego and nothing are the same state. Love in life equals love in death the individual chooses.

jackles wrote:As far as quantum physics goes the partical thats in super position is in a no spin up or down neutrality. There for the superposition or hoste state of the super position can be seen as nothing or zero. And its this nothing or zero hoste state superposition that I believe is the unmoving consciouse root of all events and is the death state of the brain .superposition and superego being indistinguishably the same nonlocality.so the nonmoving super ego survives brain death as nothing.unmoving consciousness always being independent of any brain. Love and the superego and nothing are the same state. Love in life equals love in death the individual chooses.

Jackles, you might be confusing superposition with entanglement. Superposition might be necessary for entanglement, but that doesn't make them the same. That's my understanding anyway. Others may have a better understanding than myself.

Well as far as im aware ginkgo super position of a partical is a neutral noncommited state of spin either up or down. So the partical can commit its self in terms of spin up or down on the collaps of the wavefunction. With entanglment how ever there are to seperate particals at the outset and then they the particals with opposite spin states entangle.

jackles wrote:Well as far as im aware ginkgo super position of a partical is a neutral noncommited state of spin either up or down. So the partical can commit its self in terms of spin up or down on the collaps of the wavefunction. With entanglment how ever there are to seperate particals at the outset and then they the particals with opposite spin states entangle.

No it isn't actually, "non-committed " it is actually information. The lowest state is a zero state which just means spin down.

Yes then its non commited imformation inside a nonlocal hoste. This none local hoste can be seen in entangle particals. So instant nonlocality plays hoste to the information in superposition.

jackles wrote:Yes then its non commited imformation inside a nonlocal hoste. This none local hoste can be seen in entangle particals. So instant nonlocality plays hoste to the information in superposition.

Sorry jackles, but I don't know what a non local hoste is.

As I understand it imfomation is the photon. Or its the photon that transferes information. Non locality is time. Nonlocality is pure time.