Philosophy Now Forum

Some would say no.

According to the Bible, He created a Great Flood to wipe out mankind and start anew because He was not satisfied with what mankind was doing and His patience had run out.

OTOH, God is supposed to exist forever meaning all he has to do is wait, if the situation calls for it, because He has all the time in the universe.

I think that God is an impatient sort of being due to His actions. You may feel different. What say you to this?

PhilX

No, that's why he punished you and made you a helpless retard!

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Some would say no.

According to the Bible, He created a Great Flood to wipe out mankind and start anew because He was not satisfied with what mankind was doing and His patience had run out.

OTOH, God is supposed to exist forever meaning all he has to do is wait, if the situation calls for it, because He has all the time in the universe.

I think that God is an impatient sort of being due to His actions. You may feel different. What say you to this?

PhilX

What should be looked at is God or the Absolute as I prefer is infinite.

That which is infinite does not want need or do anything - as it is everything and everwhere.

HexHammer wrote:No, that's why he punished you and made you a helpless retard!

Well look who's talking. The chief of the retards. What's the matter? Unable to make worthwhile contributions?


PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:No, that's why he punished you and made you a helpless retard!

Well look who's talking. The chief of the retards. What's the matter? Unable to make worthwhile contributions?


PhilX

It is worthwile but ofc not in your taste mr Halpless Retard of Retards!

HexHammer wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:No, that's why he punished you and made you a helpless retard!

Well look who's talking. The chief of the retards. What's the matter? Unable to make worthwhile contributions?


PhilX

It is worthwile but ofc not in your taste mr Halpless Retard of Retards!

Look who's talking about retards. Still unable to make a real contribution to this forum. Can't even spell. What's the matter? Unable to afford a free spellchecker. Outside of trolling, what purpose do you serve?

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Look who's talking about retards. Still unable to make a real contribution to this forum. Can't even spell. What's the matter? Unable to afford a free spellchecker. Outside of trolling, what purpose do you serve?

PhilX

How is stating the obvious trolling?
But you do comprehend what I'm saying, thus spelling is irrelevant.

If you wasn't a complete retard you would know the purpose of my posts, but you are ofc too stupid to comprehend.

HexHammer wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:Look who's talking about retards. Still unable to make a real contribution to this forum. Can't even spell. What's the matter? Unable to afford a free spellchecker. Outside of trolling, what purpose do you serve?

PhilX

How is stating the obvious trolling?
But you do comprehend what I'm saying, thus spelling is irrelevant.

If you wasn't a complete retard you would know the purpose of my posts, but you are ofc too stupid to comprehend.

Nobody knows the purpose of your threads, therefore you are trolling. Misspelling can lead to misunderstanding by me and others so correct spelling is relevant. But you seem to be too retarded to understand plus inconsiderate as well.

As an example, what is Ofc supposed to mean? A check with the acronym list didn't help.

99% of your posts create mischief.

PhilX

People are tired of your simpleminded questions, why you are stuck with me, get used to it!

HexHammer wrote:People are tired of your simpleminded questions, why you are stuck with me, get used to it!

Mr Hammer, I rather think it is you that has restricted the people who will correspond with you. You are stuck with those left that will still engage you.

HexHammer wrote:People are tired of your simpleminded questions, why you are stuck with me, get used to it!

Let me add that the moderators could ban you for all your ad hom postings, etc. (why they haven't done so already is beyond me) plus you haven't posted anything worth discussing. Being stuck with you, I wonder (I would like to hear from a mod regarding HexHammer).

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:People are tired of your simpleminded questions, why you are stuck with me, get used to it!

Let me add that the moderators could ban you for all your ad hom postings, etc. (why they haven't done so already is beyond me) plus you haven't posted anything worth discussing. Being stuck with you, I wonder (I would like to hear from a mod regarding HexHammer).

PhilX

''


Ditto

BeyondTheAstral wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

HexHammer wrote:People are tired of your simpleminded questions, why you are stuck with me, get used to it!

Let me add that the moderators could ban you for all your ad hom postings, etc. (why they haven't done so already is beyond me) plus you haven't posted anything worth discussing. Being stuck with you, I wonder (I would like to hear from a mod regarding HexHammer).

PhilX

''


Ditto

un-Ditto. Or whatever the opposite of ditto is. There are many ad hom postings, you can't single him out. Free speech is better than censorship - except for talk of child molestation.

HexHammer wrote:People are tired of your simpleminded questions, why you are stuck with me, get used to it!

un-Ditto. Or whatever the opposite of ditto is. There are many ad hom postings, you can't single him out. Free speech is better than censorship - except for talk of child molestation.[/quote][/quote]

How would you like to be stalked by him? (note: stalking can be viewed as a crime)

When you talk of censorship, specifically what is being censored?

PhilX (note: had to do some rewriting of this post to respond to Wyman to get around the embedded 3-quote message).

When somebody posts and article we have the opportunity of discussing the topic.

A direct attack e.g.

“No, that's why he punished you and made you a helpless retard!”

is immature, irrelevant and outside the currently accepted norm that majority abide by and as such the moderator should warn or disable the user.

“Free speech” is a gray area – it might be worthwhile posting “What do you understand by the term Free Speech”