Hi Kayla;
Kayla wrote:as a girl who does martial arts there is one form of sexism that i encounter pretty much every class
when sparring with men - or even boys - they are unwilling to use as much force as they would with a man
not just unwilling - pretty much psychologically unable
this reduces the quality of the sparring for me . Its a bit annoying at times
I don't know a great deal about martial arts, but I have raised some boys. It is pretty much accepted that in most mammal species, the male is physically stronger than the female. So little boys are often taught that they might punch their male friend, who might punch them back, and that this
can be acceptable under some circumstances. It can even be a form of male bonding. But it is not acceptable to bond with a female by punching her lights out. So I can see where a male could be "psychologically unable" if they experienced a normal kind of childhood.
Most men will hold back when dealing physically with someone younger, less experienced, or weaker -- and females are regarded as weaker. My husband used to wrestle with the kids, and as they grew older and stronger, his responses grew appropriately. The children hurt him -- sharp elbows and knees can hurt -- a lot more often than he hurt them. This was not that much different than other training, but he had the opportunity to gage their strength on a regular basis as they grew. I suspect that your sparring partners do not have the opportunity to gage your strength as well as you would prefer.
It is my understanding that control is a major component in martial arts. What if you looked to the more mature sparring partners, ones who have exquisite control, and explained your problem? Maybe you could get some of them to slowly ratchet up their responses to give you a better training session.
Kayla wrote:recently I got into an argument about how bad this sort of sexism is
i dont think its that bad. i think it is kind of sweet.
i think violence against women is a far worse problem than unwillingness to commit even practice violence against women
I agree with you.
Kayla wrote:the womens' studies major i was talking to about this insists that this sort of behavior in itself a form of violence against women and that the same men privately have no problem beating their wives
The underlined part of your statement is one of the most generally inclusive, prejudiced, and biased statements that I have ever read. I wonder how that "womens' studies major" justifies spouting that kind of crap.
Everyone talks about violence against women; but what about violence against men? I'll give you an example: I knew a young couple, who were in their early 20's, living together, but not yet married. They planned to marry. She was on birth control, but wanted to go off of it and get pregnant; he thought it would be best to wait till they were married -- it was a standing argument.
He had started a new job that was physically very demanding; she did not work out of the house. He came home one day tired, hungry, and sore to find that there was no dinner being made. She had spent the whole day working up new arguments to support her idea of getting pregnant, and started in on him as soon as he walked in the door. After a few minutes, he told her that he would not discuss it, and was going to lay down on the couch until dinner was ready. She walked into the kitchen, got a glass of milk, and then poured it over his head while he was resting on the couch. He got up and put his foot in her ass shoving her out of the room. She called the police; he was arrested.
The argument was not illegal, pouring milk over his head was not illegal, but putting his foot in her ass was domestic violence against women, even though the only thing bruised was her pride. If I had been there and witnessed that, I would have beaten that stupid bitch's ass, and would not have been arrested, even if I caused damage. It would have been considered a mutually agreed fight between two women, and not illegal. Of course, she would never have acted like that if there were witnesses, and he probably would not have let me beat her.
I worked in law for years and can assure you that there is a reason why the word, vicious, is associated more with women than it is with men. In the county next to mine, they had a big problem with domestic violence and decided that it had to be curbed. So they started a new policy; when a call came in, the police would go to the house and take
both parties to jail for a few days to cool off. The second offence would land them both in jail for a week along with a hefty fine. She learned to control her tongue; he learned to control his fists, and domestic violence rates cut in half within the first year in that county.
There are some men, who are just plain mean. There are some women, who are just plain mean. But I suspect that the high rates of domestic violence in the US are more attributable to social ignorance and bad laws.
Kayla wrote:another girl agreed that this is not as bad as willingless to commit violence but got upset at my view that as problems go this one is trivial - and in particular at my characterization of this behavior as gentlemanly and sweet
either i or those girls are crazy
thoughts?
You are just fine. "Those girls" are a little nucking futs.
Gee