Philosophy Now Forum

Is it the local -nolocal consciousness duality of the observer that causes collapse of the wave function.berring in mind that the observers consciousness is considered to be statonary and therefor nonlocal when measuring c.

No one knows.

jackles wrote:Is it the local -nolocal consciousness duality of the observer that causes collapse of the wave function?

"I'll show you mine if you show me hers." <Gunter Sachs to Patrick Curtis in 1967>

yeah male or female.that doesnt alter the double slit light experiment results one bit thus proving that the root of consciousness is independent of sex.sex is just an outer presentaion of the root which is nonlocal and omni present to the moving event.

jackles wrote:Is it the local -nolocal consciousness duality of the observer that causes collapse of the wave function.berring in mind that the observers consciousness is considered to be statonary and therefor nonlocal when measuring c.

Non-locality in relation to speed of light suggests instantaneous communication regardless of distance.

I am not sure what you mean by,"bearing in mind that the observed consciousness is considered stationary." The speed of light does not depend on its source or the observer.

yes instantenious connection is omni connection. observations of the constant c from different inertial frames ref that consciously see the dilated differences of time and space warping the locations relative to c towards nonlocality . in other words the consciouses of the observers are fully nonlocal taking up the position of the relativity in the event below c to become the unmoving measurer of c.so as far as the event going on in the observers brain is concerned consciousness is the relativity in any movment in that brain event which repesents the exact same relativity in the actual event.so the relativity in the actual event is the exact same relativity thats going on in the brain event and that is consciousness.that is why looking collapses the wave fuction.

consciousness is shown to be holding a nonlocal position or a nonmoving position when measuring c from a local moving frame of referance.so speed dialates time and space and matter toward the nonlocal.

Hi Jackles,

I saw you posted another similar topic, but answer in this one, because the title is more explicit.

I don't really understand the relation between celerity of light and the conscious.

But I developed a reasoning about c, some months ago in another forum.

I understood why physicists give sometime the (simpler) value c=1 in some theories. When I did not understood, I thought it was only a (stupid) convention.

Most physical constants have (non-understandable) dimensions, to equilibrate unities between bounded parts of an equation.

But I realized:
The measurement about 300'000 km/s is only its "splendor" as human see/measure it.

but:
If celerity of light in void is constant, in a meaning: It has no dimension !!

Of course:
As I understand the notion of dimension, -mension is for the measurement.

But if the measurement (here: in void) is constant, the notion of dimension disappear, as there is no intermediate value in-the-scale !

So the dimension disappear, and c=1.

Interesting, isn't it ?
-----
Edit:
The exact etymology of di- means: in every senses.

yes niels the way i am looking at consciousness regs c is that if you imagine the movment or flux in the event to be frozen so time related to objects ceases this is the position the observer takes on regs c.to freeze the objects the observers consciousness must be acting as being the mover.thats an analegy .but i believe consciousness to be part of the cause of the moving event and if that is so it consciousness existed before moving things existed and exists independent of the brain its self.so is it this independent consciousness that measures c as science says that when measuring c the observer is to be considered to be stationary.well the only stationary thing in existance is nonlocality.