Page 1 of 2

Why is culture?

Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:00 am
by rajeevnaikte
Culture is law and order to protect human civilization from human.
Human civilization is humans working together to survive and culture is to protect this system from human.
When negative emotions goes to extremes it creates chaos in civilization. Culture is to control these emotions.
culture is to control human from getting addicted to things which takes away peace of mind.
But what cultures (religions, communities) have done is diverted human addiction to itself.
Every system has issues, but what makes it failure is addiction to it despite of known issues.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 10:03 pm
by WanderingLands
rajeevnaikte wrote:Culture is law and order to protect human civilization from human.
Human civilization is humans working together to survive and culture is to protect this system from human.
When negative emotions goes to extremes it creates chaos in civilization. Culture is to control these emotions.
culture is to control human from getting addicted to things which takes away peace of mind.
But what cultures (religions, communities) have done is diverted human addiction to itself.
Every system has issues, but what makes it failure is addiction to it despite of known issues.
Let's face it, we're human - all too human, as the Existentialist philosophers might say. Culture may have merits, in terms of ethics, aesthetics, and spiritual teachings. But when it becomes institutionalized, it closes off the chance to be 'human', or as in to be free. That's pretty much the issue with institutionalization and bureaucracy in society.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:41 pm
by HexHammer
OP

Seems you have a very binary way of looking at things.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:14 pm
by Blaggard
Culture is the accumulated art, philosophy (by which I include reason in any form) and meaning from a society since its inception, it's not easy to pin down, but it is what makes a country have an identity which is fairly unique, no culture is like another culture exactly. Which is why it makes me laugh when Americans say they have the most influential culture on Earth sometimes, yeah they really do say that: erm hello, you got all your culture for European colonists and a small minority of natives you didn't butcher. Europe got a good deal of its in the renaissance and before from Empires like Rome, Greece and so on.

That's not to say countries don't develop culture independently of course they do, but one must tip their hat to their history and who invaded them and what not and so on.

It's like a score you accumulate as time rolls by, what it isn't is a scoreboard though ,where you can go we win culture, such a ham fisted idea is mete for morons and nationalists which are usually both. ;)

There are 3 pillars of civilisation, by which they mean, what civilisation is founded on, and all of them since we had civilisation. One is the ability to be self sufficient, usually means food resources, farming, means to store it, granaries, meat curing and so on, but can mean trade as well, any method by which a culture can remain in one place for a considerable length of time if it wants to. The other is a code of laws (needs no explanation but I will explain: can be do as I say or I kill you, or do x and y wont happen and so on, can be a codes set down in stone, such as by Hammurabi), the last is culture, which for our sins includes such things as religion, art: media such as novels, poetry TV (which I distinguish from art as not all of it is, Pokemon you're having a laugh j/k) and Justin Beiber, which is no ones fault not even the Romans. Without all 3 that tripod will and has fallen historically.

Civlisation is what it is, it lives or dies, history will out.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 9:05 pm
by Conde Lucanor
rajeevnaikte wrote:Culture is law and order to protect human civilization from human.
Human civilization is humans working together to survive and culture is to protect this system from human.
Culture is not imposed on humans from the outside. Culture is created by humans.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:06 am
by WanderingLands
Conde Lucanor wrote:
rajeevnaikte wrote:Culture is law and order to protect human civilization from human.
Human civilization is humans working together to survive and culture is to protect this system from human.
Culture is not imposed on humans from the outside. Culture is created by humans.
That's not really true, because in society there are always three groups: the leaders, the followers, and the 'outsiders'. For the most part, the leaders always influence people to adopt customs and act in certain ways, whether being political, social, or economic. The 'outsiders' are those who play the role of scapegoats and are usually persecuted for not 'following the leader' in society.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:15 am
by Blaggard
You should probably add most people are a combination of all three, and let's not forget the people who just want to watch it all burn, neither outsiders, that would be something they are outside of, to start a fire you need to be at the heart of the material you want to burn, not leaders except amongst themselves, and well followers only in that they follow one ideal, to make the world shit. In fact I think you over simplified there are probably a dozen types of people, and a dozen types of people they could likewise be, or share with others. It's not a good idea to make trite statements about civilisation, it does not lend itself to it, IMHO.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 4:07 am
by Conde Lucanor
WanderingLands wrote:
Conde Lucanor wrote:
rajeevnaikte wrote:Culture is law and order to protect human civilization from human.
Human civilization is humans working together to survive and culture is to protect this system from human.
Culture is not imposed on humans from the outside. Culture is created by humans.
That's not really true, because in society there are always three groups: the leaders, the followers, and the 'outsiders'. For the most part, the leaders always influence people to adopt customs and act in certain ways, whether being political, social, or economic. The 'outsiders' are those who play the role of scapegoats and are usually persecuted for not 'following the leader' in society.
You seem to forget that all of these groups are still part of human society, so it still holds true that "culture" in the general sense is an universal and necessary condition of humanity, not something imposed accidentally over it to fulfill an external purpose, which is implied in the wording of the original post of this thread.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:41 pm
by WanderingLands
Conde Lucanor wrote: You seem to forget that all of these groups are still part of human society, so it still holds true that "culture" in the general sense is an universal and necessary condition of humanity, not something imposed accidentally over it to fulfill an external purpose, which is implied in the wording of the original post of this thread.
Of course they are all part of human society, but the type of 'society' that has long existed and is still existing is the one that is made up of a specialized hierarchy from the elites down to the masses, or the 'herd'. The 'herd', or most of the ruled who conform to the masses, merely go along with whatever fad there is out there, without even being critical of whether or not it's good or not. You see this in politics, where politicians, rulers, and 'revolutionaries' try to sway the public to partake in a 'common cause'; they do this often by manipulation techniques that involve using emotion and languages that the followers can understand. Then there is a more cultural aspect, which is especially present in Capitalism, where people buy into whatever fad in things that the mass media (radio, television, newspapers, internet) offers.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 2:49 am
by Conde Lucanor
WanderingLands wrote:
Conde Lucanor wrote: You seem to forget that all of these groups are still part of human society, so it still holds true that "culture" in the general sense is an universal and necessary condition of humanity, not something imposed accidentally over it to fulfill an external purpose, which is implied in the wording of the original post of this thread.
Of course they are all part of human society, but the type of 'society' that has long existed and is still existing is the one that is made up of a specialized hierarchy from the elites down to the masses, or the 'herd'. The 'herd', or most of the ruled who conform to the masses, merely go along with whatever fad there is out there, without even being critical of whether or not it's good or not. You see this in politics, where politicians, rulers, and 'revolutionaries' try to sway the public to partake in a 'common cause'; they do this often by manipulation techniques that involve using emotion and languages that the followers can understand. Then there is a more cultural aspect, which is especially present in Capitalism, where people buy into whatever fad in things that the mass media (radio, television, newspapers, internet) offers.
That may be true, but the point being argued here is that this happens within the confines of human society, not imposed externally as a teleological cause. Culture is not there to serve a purpose outside of culture itself.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 3:35 am
by WanderingLands
Conde Lucanor wrote: That may be true, but the point being argued here is that this happens within the confines of human society, not imposed externally as a teleological cause. Culture is not there to serve a purpose outside of culture itself.
That's not true, as there are indeed people who have imposed culture against the governed - you see this in the past as you see it still right now. A more modern example would be the creation of 'public relations' by Edward Bernays, who coined the term to refer to the various campaigns that he endeavored with the government in figuring out ways to socially manipulate and influence people.
Some of the public relations and marketing campaigns Bernays worked on:

1913 Bernays was hired by the actor Richard Bennett to protect a play that supported sex education against police interference. Bernays set up a front group called the "Medical Review of Reviews Sociological Fund" (officially concerned with fighting venereal disease) for the purpose of endorsing the play.[21]
1915 Diaghilev's Ballet Russes American tour convinced magazines to write articles that told people that Ballet is fun to watch.
1920 Successfully hosted the first NAACP convention in Atlanta, Georgia. His campaign was considered successful because there was no violence at the convention. His campaign focused on the important contributions of African-Americans to Whites living in the South. He later received an award from the NAACP for his contribution.
In the 1920s, working for the American Tobacco Company, he sent a group of young models to march in the New York City parade. He then told the press that a group of women's rights marchers would light "Torches of Freedom". On his signal, the models lit Lucky Strike cigarettes in front of the eager photographers. The New York Times (1 April 1929) printed: "Group of Girls Puff at Cigarettes as a Gesture of 'Freedom'". This helped to break the taboo against women smoking in public. During this decade he also handled publicity for the NAACP.[22]
Bernays once engineered a "pancake breakfast" with vaudevillians for Calvin Coolidge in what is widely considered one of the first overt media acts for a president.
Bernays used his uncle Sigmund Freud's ideas to help convince the public, among other things, that bacon and eggs was the true all-American breakfast.[23]
In October 1929, Bernays was involved in promoting Light's Golden Jubilee. The event, which spanned across several major cities in the U.S., was designed to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Thomas Edison's invention of the light-bulb (though the light-bulb had been previously invented by Joseph Swan). The publicity elements of the Jubilee – including the special issuance of a U.S. postage stamp and Edison's "re-creating" the invention of the light bulb for a nationwide radio audience – provided evidence of Bernays's love for big ideas and "ballyhoo". A follow-up event for the 75th anniversary, produced for television by David O. Selznick, was titled Light's Diamond Jubilee and broadcast on all four American TV networks on October 24, 1954.
Bernays attempted to help Venida hair nets company to get women to wear their hair longer so they would use hairnets more. The campaign failed but did get government officials to require hairnets for some jobs.
Bernays worked with Procter & Gamble for Ivory-brand bar soap. The campaign successfully convinced people that Ivory soap was medically superior to other soaps. He also promoted soap through sculpting contests and floating contests because the soap floated better than its competitors'.
Bernays helped the Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) and other special interest groups to convince the American public that water fluoridation was safe and beneficial to human health. This was achieved by using the American Dental Association in a highly successful media campaign.[24]
In the 1930s, his Dixie Cup campaign was designed to convince consumers that only disposable cups were sanitary.[citation needed]
In the 1930s, he attempted to convince women that Lucky Strike cigarettes' forest green pack was the most fashionable color. Letters were written to interior and fashion designers, department stores, and prominent women of society pushing green as the new hot color for the season. Balls, gallery exhibitions, and window displays all featured green after Bernays got through with them. The result was that green did indeed become a very hot color for the 1934 season and Lucky Strike kept their pack color and female clientele intact.
He was the publicity director of the 1939 New York World's Fair.
After his semi-retirement in the 1960s he worked with the pro-health anti-smoking lawyer John Banzhaf's group, ASH and supported other anti-smoking campaigns.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays#Campaigns

His motives for these campaigns were laid out in his book Propaganda, written in 1928, in which he had blatantly said that the "unseen mechanism of society" constitutes an "invisible government" which is the "true ruling power" of a country (mainly referring to the United States).

Expanding this, Edward Bernays' work was based upon Freud's psychoanalysis work and belief that peoples' actions are unconscious, which also goes hand in hand with the development going on in America with the rise of behaviorism and other fields in psychiatry. All of these were mainly focusing on 'herd mentality', which was used to cultivate this under false belief(s) that along with doing things 'unconsciously', that their choices are mainly based on behaviors which can be easily manipulated (all of which ignore the other parts of the human which includes reasoning, thinking, etc).

Another website that you can look at is by John Taylor Gatto, who has a book on that website called The Underground History of American Education. He examines the history of how public education was installed in America and how the real agenda was to indoctrinate instead of educate children.

http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 2:55 am
by Conde Lucanor
You're still stranded at the same terminological confusion.

Once again: all that you are saying may be true, but it still goes on within human society. There is people in power and they usually impose their ideologies. If you want to use the term "culture", well yes, the hegemonic classes impose their particular cultural vision upon the others. But all groups or classes, all particular ideologies or cultures, whether hegemonic or not, belong to the more general category of human society or human culture.

What the forum member rajeevnaikte suggested in the initial post was that culture was imposed on that all-encompassing human society by a third (external) agent, which he does not specify. He says that culture is "to protect and control humans", therefore devised with a purpose (an implicit rationality) by someone else outside of humankind. Which is, of course, absurd.

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 3:17 am
by WanderingLands
Conde Lucanor wrote:You're still stranded at the same terminological confusion.

Once again: all that you are saying may be true, but it still goes on within human society. There is people in power and they usually impose their ideologies. If you want to use the term "culture", well yes, the hegemonic classes impose their particular cultural vision upon the others. But all groups or classes, all particular ideologies or cultures, whether hegemonic or not, belong to the more general category of human society or human culture.

What the forum member rajeevnaikte suggested in the initial post was that culture was imposed on that all-encompassing human society by a third (external) agent, which he does not specify. He says that culture is "to protect and control humans", therefore devised with a purpose (an implicit rationality) by someone else outside of humankind. Which is, of course, absurd.
I don't think that rajeevnaikte was implying that there was anything 'above human' that was imposing culture on humans. He was merely talking about the human elites who have an advantage by things like force, mind, and capital (hence the line, "Human civilization is humans working together to survive and culture is to protect this system from human").

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 3:51 pm
by Clinias
Civilization is the order that a society takes.

Culture is the soul of the race. Culture basically comes out of the racial types. Polynesian culture comes out of the racial characteristics of the Polynesian which is different from the Zulu. America is a product of English Individualism and Protestantism thus the word "WASP"-White Anglo Saxon Protestant. Culture is the product of both race and religion but Race comes first then religion.

French culture is different from English culture which is different from Italian culture. I lived and travelled in Europe for three and half years. Even though it was all "European", they were all different cultures and foods in Europe. There is also a difference between Northern and Southern Europe and Europe is different from Asia. Chinese culture is different from Japanese culture. Culture is by race then mixed by their religion. Culture is "life of the people".

Re: Why is culture?

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:48 pm
by rajeevnaikte
I ll try to elaborate my thoughts here.

I am not implying that there is anything 'above human' that is imposing culture on humans. Culture is built by humans for humans.
I mentioned 'Human civilization is humans working together to survive and culture is to protect this system from human.'
Here I am thinking from starting, when humans started living together and working together. Consider our basic needs - food, cloth, shelter. For individual human to fulfill all his needs on his own is difficult. So if humans work together, some humans grow food and some create clothes and share, it is easier. That's where comes 'Human civilization is humans working together to survive'.
Now, humans have emotions - love, happiness, sadness, anger, hate, lust etc. When negative emotions, like anger, goes to extremes it creates problem. (I am not sure if positive emotions goes to extremes whether it creates problem)

Let's consider two humans - one grows food another create clothes.
When these two humans are working and living together, if anger or hate is generated in these humans due to some conflicts, it becomes difficult to work/live together. Here there is need of something to control human emotions and resolve conflicts. Culture is system or set of rules to follow when these negative emotions goes to extremes.

Who creates culture? Here I see two ways: 1. When the same humans, who had conflict, come to calmness, think about their issue. If they abandon each other they have to fulfill all their needs on there own. So they themselves set some ground rules, limitations to resolve any conflicts may occur. Here each of them have to do two work - one will grow food and create culture and another will create clothes and culture. Here each will have more work but will have good understanding of culture(rules).
2. When there is third human, he can create culture for previous two humans. Now work is divided, civilization expanded. This third human gives culture as product to them and gets food and cloth.

In both ways its humans only who create culture.

Now in second way, The third human who creates culture becomes a creator, and other two becomes followers. These followers concentrate on creating food,cloth and just follow the rules created by third human and will not have complete understanding of culture. These followers will not think or questions much about the rules they are following as it works well in their current conditions. They become addicted to following these rules. When fourth human comes up with different/better strategy for living/working together and asks other three humans to follow, there comes problem. The followers who are addicted to following the old culture do not want to change, and the creator of old culture don't want to let the value of what he created to go down. Here again conflicts created. So to resolve this we need another culture. So it keeps going.

Here cultures I mentioned are to control emotions which creates conflicts when living/working together. Examples of these culture I can say are religions, communities which has set of rules - mainly beliefs.
Another type of cultures are to motivate humans to live/work together. Here examples are art, styles - food style, cloths style etc. These will be to invoke positive emotions.