Philosophy Now Forum

yes theres a part of the event that does not happen. relativity exists without of its self happening.thats the way it seems to be to me anyway.

.



Don't know if this is what you may mean but I, for one, understand that we live in a multidimensional continuum.


If there is a complete white there must be a complete black - and ALL SHADES OF GREY IN-BETWEEN.


We only EXPERIENCE one aspect of any one reality at a time yet all the realities of all experiences and possibilities exist at the same time.




So, in short, I believe ALL parts of an event happen - we experience just one of an infinite sliver of a much greater reality of events.





.

yeah we could be seeing it the same way bill.and thats slightly worrying.ha
but the way i look at it is that before something happened as in the bigbang there was a state of limitlessness nothing which shows up in the event as relativity.its simply a sizeless dimension that caused energy..so relativity causes things to move but moves not.

.



Yeah, I understand what you are expressing.


I realize that I cannot experience what a clearer reality must be like but I enjoy touching the concept that all things exist, all possibilities exist, at the same time.





.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.



Yeah, I understand what you are expressing.


I realize that I cannot experience what a clearer reality must be like but I enjoy touching the concept that all things exist, all possibilities exist, at the same time.





.

I don't know if this is what you mean, Bill, but the idea that reality is one great thing that exists all at the same time, goes back to Parmenides. More recently it has been called a 'block universe'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternalism ... y_of_time)

.



Yes. That is what I conceive of a higher view of reality may feel like.


An insignificant difference, I imagine multidimensional reality instead of just the aforementioned four dimensions. Time being the fourth.





.

the thing in itself is never sensed

-Imp

the thing its self cant be sensed but the thing its self does not move .relativity doesnt move.

jackles wrote:the thing its self cant be sensed but the thing its self does not move .relativity doesnt move.

How are you sensing this?

if something is eternity then it cant be moving.by logic eternity is then the relativity in the event.that includes the relativity between male and female.you sence it by emotion but the emotion is awareness which cant be explained.only by the logic that if what you sence is eternity it then cannot be moving in a relative way.so it then has to be the relativity that does not move.emotional awareness is relativity the relativity in the event all forms of relativity including objective relativity.its the old consciousness problem no one knows what it is.what im am saying is that consciousness is probably relativity .