Baudrillard and dissimulation of the natural
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:59 pm
thanks
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
let's take it piece by piece:As has been observed by Baudrillard, representations of the model of production lend themselves as window to reveal the dissimulation of the natural.
Does it indeed say "model" of production, or "mode of production"? Because a model is a model, and since this is a philosophy forum and not an architecture forum, you probably would know better then in case it says "model". However, a "mode of production" is a Marxist term for any specific "setup" of an economy, consisting of the way people relate to each other as parts of a total production process in for instance a national economy, the manner in which things are produced (tools and know-how), and so forth.representations of the model of production
Rather obviously this means "this gives us insight about/let's us see how it's like", so read that into the sub-sentence.lend themselves as window to reveal
Here's the more non-obvious part. Dissimulation is a new word to me, so I looked it up (http://onelook.com/?w=dissimulation&ls=a), turns out to be rather straight forward however. One thing this sub-sentence can mean then is that the natural is imperfect, it is not "up there", like the ideal. However, I'd also be conscious of the context here, as "natural" can mean so widely many things to so many people, and especially when we are talking architecture this might have very specific meanings outside of ordinary language.the dissimulation of the natural.