dangerous nonsense
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:42 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_ ... ling_views"It is, in principle, not possible to formulate a final notion concerning the nature of reality, i.e., a Theory of Everything."
"There is ultimately no sustainable distinction between reality and thought, and correspondingly, there no distinction between the observer and observed in an experiment or any other situation (other than a distinction between relatively separate entities valid in the sense of explicate order); "
"Any form of relative autonomy (and heteronomy) is ultimately limited by holonomy, so that in a broad enough context such forms are seen to be merely aspects, relevated in the holomovement, rather than disjoint and separately existent things in interaction."