There's no such thing as unmoving space jackles and no way of deriving a fixed point in space or centre of the universe it is a principle derived from both special and general relativity that all objects are comoving.
The Earth is moving at about 30km/s and spinning at about 1000mph.
It also goes round in orbit about galactic central point about every 3 million years, it is also part of an expanding co moving fabric of time and space, and for example is due to collide with andromeda forming an even larger galaxy.
There are no fixed points there is no object anywhere that is hence non relative. And time and space are different for different observers hence by the same laws of reality, objectivity about time is impossible and absolute time is equally ridiculous.
What you are on about just sounds like a mangling of Buddhist/Hindu philosophy of being atma or one with the universe and the laws of relativity. What follows is an explanation of why magic does not exist.
http://blog.wolfram.com/2011/07/28/how- ... unflowers/
Nature is more than the sum of its parts.
It’s really magical that this works at all, since the spatial relationship of each seed to its neighbors is unique, changing constantly as the pattern expands outwardly—unlike, say, the cells in a honeycomb, which are all equivalent. I wondered if the same magic could be applied to surfaces that are not flat, like spheres, toruses, or wine glasses. It’s an interesting question from an aesthetic point of view, but also a practical one: the answer has applications in space exploration and modern architecture.
To reproduce the flat sunflower pattern mathematically, you need to know three secrets of the arrangement:
Seeds spiral outward from the center, each positioned at a fixed angle relative to its predecessor.
The fixed angle is the golden angle, γ = 2π(1 – 1/Φ), where Φ is the golden ratio.
The ith seed in the pattern is placed at a distance from the center proportional to the square root of i.
Imaginary numbers ah is there nothing you cannot do!
And what does the above have to do with this?
Everything literally all life is modelled on wave particle dualities equations it is a ToE not a theory of evolution but a Thoery of Everything.
The Dirac equation which can model hydrogen spectra also see Fynman's path integral formula for more details.
Incidentally a definite integral is entirely the sum of its parts, by defintion.
Which is why a Gaussian is used to model probability densities and electromagnetic phenomena such as electron flow, voltage, quantum mechanics and everything stochastic rather than classical.
Hence:
Relativistic Breit–Wigner distribution
The relativistic Breit–Wigner distribution (after Gregory Breit and Eugene Wigner) is a continuous probability distribution with the following probability density function:[1]
Where k is the constant of proportionality, equal to

with=
(This equation is written using natural units, ħ = c = 1.) It is most often used to model resonances (unstable particles) in high-energy physics. In this case E is the center-of-mass energy that produces the resonance, M is the mass of the resonance, and Γ is the resonance width (or decay width), related to its mean lifetime according to τ = 1/Γ. (With units included, the formula is τ = ħ/Γ.) The probability of producing the resonance at a given energy E is proportional to f(E), so that a plot of the production rate of the unstable particle as a function of energy traces out the shape of the relativistic Breit–Wigner distribution.
In general, Γ can also be a function of E; this dependence is typically only important when Γ is not small compared to M and the phase space-dependence of the width needs to be taken into account. (For example, in the decay of the rho meson into a pair of pions.) The factor of M2 that multiplies Γ2 should also be replaced with E2 (or E4/M2, etc.) when the resonance is wide.[2]
The form of the relativistic Breit–Wigner distribution arises from the propagator of an unstable particle, which has a denominator of the form p2 − M2 + iMΓ. Here p2 is the square of the four-momentum carried by the particle. The propagator appears in the quantum mechanical amplitude for the process that produces the resonance; the resulting probability distribution is proportional to the absolute square of the amplitude, yielding the relativistic Breit–Wigner distribution for the probability density function as given above.
The form of this distribution is similar to the solution of the classical equation of motion for a damped harmonic oscillator driven by a sinusoidal external force.