Philosophy Now Forum

Gaze upon yourselves!
For it is time to realise, that Ye haths the ability to gain divine powers!
Ye can weild mighty weapons of destructions, like no man ever could!
Ye haths the ability to see far away, in foren countries!
Word can travel instantly wide and far, that no voice of any king could!
Ye word can reach the many and move the masses, and Thine will is boundless if it is strong enough!
With education and knowledge, we can give life to the dying, and death to the living.

..rule as a ruler in our cybernetic world!

O blind man who choseth not to see, that was in a world of lust and avarice, of but discernment, of but the conscious reason over rhyme that forsakes such time, but did not here the chimes at midnight hence hear them, did not see the scope of people how they are not but me.

Hence does such a person wave his sword wildly amongst the foe and kill as he supposes he "sees" so.

A man is but a person cast adrift on a shore of disfavour, avowing distinction amongst all other blind men, as based he trusts on his own incorrigible blindness and his flavour.

If man be a man he will see, if a man be a man he will here if not and likewise not hear; there is nothing he will find amongst other people. Thee will lean upon a sword and by its blade hence will you be cut so hence adhere.

Rule if you must but avow a rule of any man upon any man must like be just...

Yeah we can all write poetry Hex, what was your point?

That he taketh his hammer, and bangeth it sixeth times threeth, as thou cryith in paneth at the hilarity of sucheth spectacle. Thateh the theneth openness ofeth oppositions headeth, is mucheth truer ineth it's flatness thaneth thateth of the wielder of sucheth a mighty hammer. All haileth the Hammer wielder of sixeth times threeth as it's the flateth hammer of themeth all. It'seth a speecheth impedimenteth, sorryeth!

Oh please! Everybody shut the thuck up. Blaggard is right Mr Hammer, any clown can talk like a rejected sword and sandal script. If you have a point, make it and spare us the nonsens and babble.

uwot wrote: If you have a point, make it and spare us the nonsens and babble.

You fail at simple logic.

It is selfcontradicting to say something is nonsense and babble, and at the same time demand the person to make a point.
If it truly was nonsense and babble there would be no rational point to make.

Try to be clever, just for once.

HexHammer wrote:

uwot wrote: If you have a point, make it and spare us the nonsens and babble.

You fail at simple logic.

It is selfcontradicting to say something is nonsense and babble, and at the same time demand the person to make a point.
If it truly was nonsense and babble there would be no rational point to make.

Try to be clever, just for once.

You first.

In 1800, Immanuel Kant wrote in his book Logic:

"The identity of concepts in analytical judgments can be either explicit (explicita) or non-explicit (implicita). In the former case analytic propositions are tautological."

So which is it if something is nonsense and babble it has no point to make, if something is nonsense and babble it has a point to make? Or is this wonderful tautology you have fabricated actually in any sense reasoned?

Ironically you fail at simple logic. Whilst simultaneously admitting that what you said was in fact nonsense and babble by analytical philosophy or formal logic there is no other logical conclusion.

So I say again you first.

HexHammer wrote:It is selfcontradicting to say something is nonsense and babble, and at the same time demand the person to make a point.

No it isn't; it may be wishful thinking , but it is not self-contradictory. It's actually what you do in most of your posts. The point is, just because everything you have said on this forum is nonsense and babble, it doesn't follow that everything you ever will say will be. It's the problem of induction. Look it up.
I know Blaggard, he won't.

I done some real logic, I am too busy patting myself on the back for my airtight semi formal argument to care what Hex will and wont do atm.

uwot wrote:

HexHammer wrote:It is selfcontradicting to say something is nonsense and babble, and at the same time demand the person to make a point.

No it isn't; it may be wishful thinking , but it is not self-contradictory. It's actually what you do in most of your posts. The point is, just because everything you have said on this forum is nonsense and babble, it doesn't follow that everything you ever will say will be. It's the problem of induction. Look it up.
I know Blaggard, he won't.

This is blatant bs!

HexHammer wrote:

uwot wrote:

HexHammer wrote:It is selfcontradicting to say something is nonsense and babble, and at the same time demand the person to make a point.

No it isn't; it may be wishful thinking , but it is not self-contradictory. It's actually what you do in most of your posts. The point is, just because everything you have said on this forum is nonsense and babble, it doesn't follow that everything you ever will say will be. It's the problem of induction. Look it up.
I know Blaggard, he won't.

This is blatant bs!

No what you have been spouting on this thread is blatant bs, and what's more everyone knows it, it seems except you...

This is a plea to have you explain the op. Which will no doubt fall on deaf ears, but meh, judging by your usual input that's not entirely a bad thing IMHO.

HexHammer wrote:This is blatant bs!

Maybe, but if you can't provide an argument why, your claim is just cozy chat. Even philosophy has standards, Mr Hammer.

uwot wrote:

HexHammer wrote:This is blatant bs!

Maybe, but if you can't provide an argument why, your claim is just cozy chat. Even philosophy has standards, Mr Hammer.

Enough of your trolling and deraling!

uwot wrote:

HexHammer wrote:This is blatant bs!

Maybe, but if you can't provide an argument why, your claim is just cozy chat. Even philosophy has standards, Mr Hammer.

HexHammer wrote:Enough of your trolling and deraling!

HexHammer wrote:This is blatant bs!

uwot wrote:Maybe, but if you can't provide an argument why, your claim is just cozy chat. Even philosophy has standards, Mr Hammer.

HexHammer wrote:Enough of your trolling and deraling!

Don't be silly, Mr Hammer; you know perfectly well that you are unlikely to stop dismissing things that you don't understand; either as cozy chat, pure nonsens, babble, trolling, deraling or who knows what else, without you offering any substantive argument in support. This is a philosophy forum, Mr Hammer; your contributions, not uniquely, to be fair, are completely inept. You have no idea what you are talking about. You can remedy this by finding out a bit about what philosophy is; perhaps then you might not appear so ridiculous. You can cure ignorance; there's no hope if your posts are the result of stupidity.

I apologize Mr. HexHammer, as you have far too large a mob on your back right now, and I'm not a party to such things.

I would please ask you though, to supply some real meat and potatoes for all to chew on, as I believe that most commonly believe that you can supply none.

Please take some of your "valuable" time and formulate a viable argument, that is if you care to eliminate this mob rule mentality, than many men participate in.

Make a solid case, that only the most knowledgeable can argue, as to the intent of your thread. Speak slower or more clearly.