Page 1 of 3
The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:08 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
Involve Any Words, Just a Continued Feeling of, I am Here; The Practice of Self-Consciousness
* The words above are a continuation of the title. My supporting argument for my thesis is contained in the following:
.
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 10:41 am
by attofishpi
Nope...i got nuffin...but i have faith in the Bing[bot] that's browsing this forum...
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2014 3:10 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
I appreciate your response. What is a Bing[bot]?
................................
.
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:46 am
by attofishpi
This is a BING[BOT]
And what it is...
...its a robot built by the Bing company who run a search engine, to spend its existence indexing all the crap that we post on this and other forums...so that when people search for stuff...on said search engine...it actually does direct them to their desired crap.
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:00 pm
by Bill Wiltrack
.
...so, you are saying that the Bing[bot] does not recognize true prayer as being a silent submittal of ourselves to this moment or are you attempting to correctly respond as...i got nuffin; meaning - I'm not thinking...I'm not doing any unnecessary thinking to destroy this moment...?
.................................................................
.
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:13 pm
by attofishpi
I AM
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:19 am
by Hjarloprillar
attofishpi wrote:I AM
Well said. So few remember the basics.
cogito ergo sum.
They are cogito cogito ergo sum. Which is just cowardly .
Prill
[welcome to the love-in
]
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:47 am
by thedoc
attofishpi wrote:I AM
NOT
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:21 am
by Hjarloprillar
thedoc wrote:attofishpi wrote:I AM
NOT
Doc
HAAhaaa
As Elmer Fudd would say..
"you wabble wowser"
[profession. advocati diaboli.]
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:00 am
by attofishpi
thedoc wrote:attofishpi wrote:I AM
NOT
Dixi ergo ut ego
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:17 am
by Hjarloprillar
Dixi i did not know. [the latin]
also
DIXI is an acronym for "Deep Impact Extended Investigation", part of the EPOXI space exploration program.
I learned something today.
ta
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:02 am
by attofishpi
"Dixi ergo ut ego"
Came up when i typed into google translate: "I thought therefore i was"
...but it certainly does not translate back the same.
Ergo, i know no Latin!
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:12 am
by thedoc
Cogito ergo sum, so I know that I exist, but I have my doubts about the rest of you, or at least if you are real human beings. You could all be computer generated just to piss me off.
There are mystics who believe that if they learn to concentrate and meditate just right, they can make the world dissolve into nothing, Doesn't seem to be working for you guys. damn! back to meditating some more. Maybe if I think happy thoughts, - no that's for flying.
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:15 am
by thedoc
Throw yourself at the ground and miss, My aim is off just a bit, got the bruises to prove it.
Re: The Argument That Prayer, True Prayer, Does Not -
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:26 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.
.................................
True Prayer; Wordless acceptance of the momentary reality.
Pure self-consciousness.
.