Page 1 of 2
pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 9:39 pm
by jackles
are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 4:26 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
Pyramids are many thing, but they are unrelated to QM in any meaningful way.
Pyramids are primarily about the expression of political and religious power.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:01 pm
by jackles
Yes but why would an eye be usually seen at top.the freemasons use this symbol on there regalier.all things have connection.the eye to me represents nonlocation or omni presents.the pyramid represents place or location on the physical plain.omni present sizeless ness the all seeing time and spaceless eye.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:54 am
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:Yes but why would an eye be usually seen at top.the freemasons use this symbol on there regalier.all things have connection.the eye to me represents nonlocation or omni presents.the pyramid represents place or location on the physical plain.omni present sizeless ness the all seeing time and spaceless eye.
Why would any crack-pot society use any bunch of mystical symbolism?
If you put an eye on a pyramid, that does not make a pyramid anything more than it already was.
A Pyramid is a square based 3D shape whose four corners extend equally to a point in in the vertical plain. It doesn't mean shit.
The eye of providence is not an item of Egyptian mysticism, but a late Medieval Xian symbol adopted by a boy's own aristo club called the Masons, who banded together to protect the interests of their own class, and its economic interests.
Only a fool would be sucked into this.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:03 pm
by Impenitent
http://www.history.com/shows/ancient-al ... ien-theory
I think it was probably the Grays although I wouldn't rule out the Awful Green Things....
-Imp
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:53 am
by hammock
jackles wrote:are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
No ancient reflection of current knowledge. In Egypt, they expressed the now extinct faith of the pharaohs. The structure was like a representational staircase or mountain climb of the dead ruler's spiritual ascent to becoming a god. Also served as tomb for protecting the body, which apparently had to endure to sustain the soul's immortality. Ridiculous overkill, since the monuments did not prevent robbers and advertised all the more, like the equivalent of neon lights, that "Here be a stash of riches". No vast, land-roaming search required as with hidden burial sites.
The pyramids of Meso-America offered an impressive stage for religious rituals and human sacrifices. Sometimes not even death of human or animal being involved. Just a ruler or priest running a rough cord through a hole in the tongue to get an ample offering of royal or sacerdotal blood gushing into or onto the sacred whatever objects. Demonstrate to the crowd that it wasn't always sold children, older virgins, and prisoners of war that were "willing" to appease the gods with their bashed skulls, torn hearts, or variously butchered bodies. Those good ol' boys and gals at the Top could make their limited contributions of suffering and hemorrhaging, too.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:11 am
by Hobbes' Choice
hammock wrote:jackles wrote:are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
No ancient reflection of current knowledge. In Egypt, they expressed the now extinct faith of the pharaohs. The structure was like a representational staircase or mountain climb of the dead ruler's spiritual ascent to becoming a god. Also served as tomb for protecting the body, which apparently had to endure to sustain the soul's immortality. Ridiculous overkill, since the monuments did not prevent robbers and advertised all the more, like the equivalent of neon lights, that "Here be a stash of riches". No vast, land-roaming search required as with hidden burial sites.
The pyramids of Meso-America offered an impressive stage for religious rituals and human sacrifices. Sometimes not even death of human or animal being involved. Just a ruler or priest running a rough cord through a hole in the tongue to get an ample offering of royal or sacerdotal blood gushing into or onto the sacred whatever objects. Demonstrate to the crowd that it wasn't always sold children, older virgins, and prisoners of war that were "willing" to appease the gods with their bashed skulls, torn hearts, or variously butchered bodies. Those good ol' boys and gals at the Top could make their limited contributions of suffering and hemorrhaging, too.
All the later pyramids did not have the "steps" upward like some sort of stairway to heaven.
They were all clad in completely sheer, smooth polished marble, all of which has been robbed away as the centuries have passed. The step appearance of the big 3 at Giza, for example, are all the result of vandalism
What a Sight they must have been reflecting the sun.
Such is the power of belief. It's a shame no one ever believed a thing that was true.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:06 pm
by jackles
Its my belief the pyramids are repsentations of universal place or location.the piont at the top is what the pyramid and the rest of the universe is inside . which is the consciousness of the observing localised being.so in effect the observer is walking around in a nonlocal never happened consciousness.the piont goes from local sizelike happening into sizeless nonlocal never happened consciosness which the whole universe sits in.sizeless donsnt mean small.it means limitless.the piont at the top of the pyramid is limitless consiousness.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:Its my belief the pyramids are repsentations of universal place or location.
If this is not an example of "belief" not being worth a shit I don't know what is.
The fact of the matter is that it is of no matter or consequence what you belief the pyramids "represent". You can have them represent anything you like. But without evidence, or any historical reference, that belief will remain your alone.
jackles wrote:
the piont at the top is what the pyramid and the rest of the universe is inside . which is the consciousness of the observing localised being.so in effect the observer is walking around in a nonlocal never happened consciousness.the piont goes from local sizelike happening into sizeless nonlocal never happened consciosness which the whole universe sits in.sizeless donsnt mean small.it means limitless.the piont at the top of the pyramid is limitless consiousness.
And do you believe a pyramid will sharpen any razors you place under them over-night too?
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:23 pm
by jackles
About the razors i dont know maybe maybe not.its worth a shot though if you just happen to bump into one.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 8:22 pm
by hammock
jackles wrote:Its my belief the pyramids are repsentations of universal place or location.the piont at the top is what the pyramid and the rest of the universe is inside . which is the consciousness of the observing localised being.so in effect the observer is walking around in a nonlocal never happened consciousness.the piont goes from local sizelike happening into sizeless nonlocal never happened consciosness which the whole universe sits in.sizeless donsnt mean small.it means limitless.the piont at the top of the pyramid is limitless consiousness.
Sounds
like another anachronistic trend that people wander into. Where today's fashions, sci-tech concepts, and socio-ideological sensitivities are at least partially projected upon a past era. Usually sported in the "what-if" products of a genre of alternate historical fiction in the entertainment industry; but there can also be literal, outrageous attempts to revise / edit the "memory archives of civilization". In this case, maybe you're as much tossing centuries-later Pythagorean mysticism into the potpourri as quantum physics. Call it "nile-punk" or "lotus-punk", if you are / were actually less serious or indulging in a facetious brand of sci-fi / art.
"The suffix -Punk, when it is put near to another suggestive technological / social era, identifies cultural movements of people who, while are attracted to the core tropes of a given era, are not or not only interested in historical accuracy." [Examples: steampunk, dieselpunk, Teslapunk, clockpunk, swordpunk, etc]
Vaguely calls to mind the "just say no to the history of ideas" phase of early analytic philosophy; the latter presented for awhile as a para-philosophical alternative to Plato's tradition. Where the few older thinkers that were evaluated [still considered ancestrally / marginally important] had their work often amusingly misinterpreted / misunderstood. As if those dead white guys had been futuro-spectively trying to satisfy a 20th century Anglophone-centered audience and its own box of intellectual eccentricities, conceptual passions, and habits / goals / conceits. Rather than writing in the context of the issues, frameworks, and anticipated critical receptions / reviews of their own times.
- - - - - - -
http://egyptianchristianity.com/hebrew_ ... ents_2.htm
"... Another dramatic departure from the traditional view is that the cosmos is now seen as an integrated system that, in some mysterious way, is profoundly unified. Indeed, one of the most stunning insights from modern science has been the discovery of 'nonlocality.' Things that are seemingly separate are really connected in fundamental ways that transcend the limitations of ordinary space and time. Still another astounding discovery is that immense levels of energy flow through the Universe and continuously regenerate it. As physicist Brian Swimme explains,'"The Universe emerges out of an all-nourishing abyss not only 15 billion years ago but in every moment.' Everything in the cosmos is a flowing movement that arises with everything else, moment by moment, in a process of continuous regeneration. Some scientists now suggest that, not only is our Universe alive, it has also evolved through natural selection.
"These Ancient Spiritual Masters both both knew and understood that our existence as mankind is identical to the Universe as a whole and the Universe as a whole is identical to our existence. Each individual human life is a microcosm of the life of the Universe. Such a view of Creation meant that man was aware that Divine Power (neteru and the manifestations of God) confronted men and women wherever they turned. Many, many neters inhabited the animal, vegetable, and mineral world of Egypt. The neters are drawn from the creative images of the land itself. Let me give you one example. Egypt received a yearly inundation - an annual flood - of the Nile. Receiving little if any rain...."
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:14 pm
by jackles
Well thats a bit of a mixed pot .but the last bit realy rings true to my own belief.about the universe that is.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:53 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:Well thats a bit of a mixed pot .but the last bit realy rings true to my own belief.about the universe that is.
QED: belief is of no consequence or importance.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:24 am
by jackles
May be you have been watching to much telly.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:39 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
jackles wrote:May be you have been watching to much telly.
Odd thing to say.
You can believe whatever you want, it's still meaningless unless it is justified in some way.