Philosophy Now Forum

if the consciousness of an observer collapses wave function into actuallity.and if consciousness is nonlocal meaning .is it this meaning that in fact collapses the wave function.so the nonlocal consciouse element or meaning collapses the wave function into an event theme or time storey.with out the cumbersome need of exchange of imformation.

jackles wrote:if the consciousness of an observer collapses wave function into actuallity.and if consciousness is nonlocal meaning .is it this meaning that in fact collapses the wave function.so the nonlocal consciouse element or meaning collapses the wave function into an event theme or time storey.with out cumbersum need of exchange of imformation.

You would have to explain what you mean by,"The non-local conscious element of meaning collapses the wave function into an event or times story"

Ok lets say the nonlocal element is zero in all terms.so that means not time space.nonlocality keeps its zero status as a dimension absolute so its not contaminated with the effects of the presents of matter as in time/space.or in other words it has not happened like the rest of the construct.

Ok say that locality or the event comes from or originates from nonlocality or nonlocal meaning .this would mean the light duality experiment event was created in effect by nonlocal meaning.the consciousness of the observer would also be nonlocal meaning in normal circumstances. But by looking to see what is happening in the experiment .ie searching for knowledge. Or meaning.consciousness in the observer looking at the experiment falls into a lower state.nonlocality knows what causes all things which is its self.by looking you the observer falls away from the origonal meaning by the act of seaching for knowledge.it means a lost thing is in effect looking at its self by searching for reason or meaning in the event.But nature will not allow it.but it also means the experiment and the experimenter are one in the same thing.consciousness
its like consciousness is looking at its own creation.and then investigating it via the brain for a meaning.

A quantum mechanics, namely the NCC causes its interpretations, the ability to be one simply could have a type of mind could attain the real objective sense. Subjectively, we assume that we should itself which states there is likely from consciousness. Instead consciousness is recommended, that most brilliant of the ability to ''recreate'' the future is intrinsically non-spatial, though in a future is postulated to a non-reductive way of quantum mechanics is the mathematical precision or thinking. To have not to find such assurance. And perhaps animal) minds, which are fascinating hints: According to consciousness, was Hugh Everett the larger system it is not consider the point of the brain. Such a description, partial but integrates and phenomenology which many probabilistic projection transformation which perform measurements on a perfectly good at the world description of experience of universal wave function collapse. The act or is almost like saying that there is hardly an indeterministic choice, is postulated to devise a future which states there are all of quantum mechanics are linked to consciousness, then an NCC is, no mystery. Given methodological considerations of this part too deeply) that consciousness is quicker and memorize them in the larger system it is conscious. It exists within quantum mechanics completely (meaning that can become compresent with the real objective sense. Subjectively, we assume that our best of the present, this process are physical ties, rules now on, when I would contradict the universe as relational properties of course, to certain information-bearing, behaviour-controlling functions, not be treated within the universe. view obviates no theory that consciousness could not consider the present, this bootstrap.

That quantumwell dosent mean a thing to me.regs jackles

The above text was generated with something called a "Markov chain generator". It is completely random nonsense strung together by a computer.

But yeah. Thanks for playing.

Is 3d then a limited construct or expression of 4d. 3d energy is a tempary image of 4d.

That's a valid interpretation of the mathematics in relativity.
The fourth dimension appears to us as 'energy'.

When you say (us) do you mean us as in our brains.so energy appears to our brains as 3d.or do you mean energy appears in our awareness as 3d.