Page 1 of 1

SRT by an uneducated Socratus.

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 12:10 pm
by socratus
SRT by an uneducated Socratus.
=.
SRT is based on three facts !
Fact number 1:
The constant speed of photon in vacuum is minimal.
Fact number 2:
The inertia of photon depends on its potential energy: E=Mc^2
Fact number 3:
Every speed and energy
( including the speed and energy of photon ) are relative.
===.
Israel Socratus

Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus.

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 6:49 pm
by Cerveny
socratus wrote:SRT by an uneducated Socratus.
=.
SRT is based on three facts !
Fact number 1:
The constant speed of photon in vacuum is minimal.
Fact number 2:
The inertia of photon depends on its potential energy: E=Mc^2
Fact number 3:
Every speed and energy
( including the speed and energy of photon ) are relative.
===.
Israel Socratus
You would not believe in STR too much.... Anyway photon is not a "particle", it is a manifestation of electromagnetic waves :)

Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus.

Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:50 am
by socratus
socratus wrote:SRT by an uneducated Socratus.
=.
SRT is based on three facts !
Fact number 1:
The constant speed of photon in vacuum is minimal.
Fact number 2:
The inertia of photon depends on its potential energy: E=Mc^2
Fact number 3:
Every speed and energy
( including the speed and energy of photon ) are relative.
===.
Israel Socratus
More details
===.
The basis of SRT ( by an uneducated Socratus)
===.
SRT is based on four facts.

Fact number 1:
The constant speed of photon in vacuum is minimal.
( from vacuum's point of view and tachyon theory )

Fact number 2:
The inertia of photon depends on its potential energy: E=Mc^2
In 1905 Einstein asked:
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content ?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, it depends on E= Mc^2 ”
It means that inertia of quantum particle (photon, electron )
depends on E= Mc^2 ( nobody explains the details of such
possibility of inertia movement. How can E=Mc^2
be responsible for inertial movement of quantum particle ? )
Someone wrote to me:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “


Fact number 3:
Every speed and energy
( including the speed and energy of photon ) are relative.
Speed, energy, impulse . . . . etc they are physical parameters
which belong to one, single quantum particle.
If you change one parameter all others will change automatically too.
For example :
In 1916 Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c.
If you change one electron's parameter all others parameters
also will be changed and the electron's energy will change too.
Take, for example, electron in atom.
Electron tied with atom by the energy: E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV.
But if someone parameter changes, then electron jumps out from atom
with energy E=h*f ( it is said: electron emits quantum of light,
but where this quantum of light is hidden in the electron, in which pocket ?)
In vacuum the energy of electron is E=Mc^2 (according to SRT and Dirac),
but when someone parameter is changed then electron jumps out from
vacuum with energy E=h*f. ( effect of vacuum fluctuation ).

Fact number 4:
The Lorentz equations explain the transformations (revolving movement)
of quantum particles using the Goudsmit – Uhlenbeck inner impulse
of particle: h* = h/ 2pi.
===.
All the best.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
=====…
P.S.
" Einstein's special theory of relativity is based on two postulates:
One is the relativity of motion, and the second is the constancy
and universality of the speed of light.
Could the first postulate be true and the other false?
If that was not possible, Einstein would not have had to make two
postulates. But I don't think many people realized until recently
that you could have a consistent theory in which you changed only
the second postulate."
/ Lee Smolin, The Trouble With Physics, p. 226. /
#
Question:
Can quantum of light change its constant speed ?
Answer: Faster-than-light.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light
etc . . .
===…

Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus.

Posted: Tue Jun 25, 2013 3:58 am
by Kuznetzova
socratus wrote:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “

Currently, there seems to be (at least) two interpretations of the activity of the Higgs boson: 1) the older, original interpretation of the Higgs as the scalar or gauge boson which determines the rest masses of the IVBs and elementary particles (which I can understand and endorse); 2) a newer (additional? alternative?) interpretation consisting of a "Higgs ether" which acts as the source of particle mass in the sense of inertial resistance to acceleration. In this latter interpretation, all massive particles interact with a universal Higgs field in proportion to their bound energy content, and it is this interaction or "Higgs ether drag" which causes the inertial resistance to acceleration we characterize as mass. It is this latter interpretation which I cannot understand or endorse, as it seems to force a distinction between rest mass and inertial mass, and has no power at all to explain Einstein's relativistic mass. However, replacing the "Higgs ether drag" hypothesis (but retaining the Higgs scalar hypothesis) with a "gravitational field drag" hypothesis does allow us to understand the mechanism of relativistic variability in the metric and energetic parameters of mass, and crucially preserves the necessary equivalence between inertial and rest mass.


http://www.johnagowan.org/higgsx.html


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqNg819PiZY

Re: SRT by an uneducated Socratus.

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:14 am
by Cerveny
socratus wrote:...
Someone wrote to me:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “
The essence of inertial motion is based on the replication of the universe (space) into new time layers. (Some structural defects - such as screw dislocations - cannot be smoothed by simply adding new elements, they can be negated only by an interaction with the opposite type of disorder.) So if we see elementary particles as the mentioned defects of regular structure of physical space, they are replicated to the new time layer during the condensation (crystallization, growth) of the universe. If certain force operates on they, it causes some deformation of the substrate (of the "presence") which affects the way of storing of new time layers of the reality (an appropriate motion:-)