Philosophy Now Forum

http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-cultu ... -ve-gauche :

RE: Slovoj Zizek:

Note that Levy separates from Zizek (who I saw interviewed on DemocracyNow) . Often, when leftists disagree, the result is violence. (Trotsky/Stalin; Maurice Bishop/Bernard Coard) A debate between Levy and Zizek would be interesting. Maybe Rick Lewis can arrange one.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/z/zizek.htm

I think that in the past I read a book by Levy. I believe it was called Barbarism with a Human Face. I found him to be a thoughtful leftist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard-He ... in_English

Tom

Philosopher Slavj Zezek was interviewed this morning on DemocracyNow which I watch to get my daily dose of commie thought. The interview lasts about ten minutes. http://www.democracynow.org/2009/10/15/ ... zek_on_the
____________________

tbieter wrote:http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-cultu ... -ve-gauche :

RE: Slovoj Zizek:

Note that Levy separates from Zizek (who I saw interviewed on DemocracyNow) . Often, when leftists disagree, the result is violence. (Trotsky/Stalin; Maurice Bishop/Bernard Coard) A debate between Levy and Zizek would be interesting. Maybe Rick Lewis can arrange one.

http://www.iep.utm.edu/z/zizek.htm

I think that in the past I read a book by Levy. I believe it was called Barbarism with a Human Face. I found him to be a thoughtful leftist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard-He ... in_English

Tom

I'm not sure if I would call this a complete disagreement. There are some distinct differences, but the conflict you speak of usually results from two concrete ideas that are impossible to budge. I am also interested to see a sit down, but feel like it may be more constructive than you imagine. what I find to be the most interesting issue is the differences these two have regarding physical health. When philosophy mixes with medical issues I have been surprised at the differing opinions.

Criticism of the moral sense of Mr. Levy:

"We suspect this may be a truth Mr. Lévy has difficulty absorbing. As we noted, it is unlikely that the case of the pathetic Dominique Strauss-Kahn will long engage the public. But anyone familiar with Lévy’s work will have reason to think again about the significance of the arrogance and minatory frivolity that are its leading characteristics. They are the traits, no doubt, that have made him such a hit among the extensively educated. But as his latest effusion suggests, his coy, involuted ironies betray a profound moral obtuseness and political infantilism."

http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cf ... t-men-7051