A Philosophy of Mind

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:54 am

BB,
I would have started with this "The last part the work is real totality of body considers geological, vegetable and animal nature" and given its from the German Idealists I'd start with the last proposition and work backwards.
This, "I’ll start with Physics the scientific study of matter, energy force and motion" will just cause incomprehension now-a-days as Physics is the field doing this now. Given that Hegel is your muse, are you talking about how the world appears to us?

Barbara Brooks · Post by **Barbara Brooks** » Sat Jan 17, 2009 5:38 pm

The Geological organism does not contain life within itself nor does it constitute a process. Its organism lies in the past what Nature has left behind as the Earth connects with the solar system. The division of the old world from the new by physical, organic and anthropological characteristics and old and new mountain ranges. The Earth is merely this and has such and such a place in the solar system, occupies a place in a series of planets appears as dead product; Earth is where such moments of magnetism, electricity and chemical process are revealed.

In so far as we are to consider the process of earth, we must consider Earth's past and shape is the process of the Elements Fire and Water, both principles must be recognized as essential, the chief subject matter of geognosy. Earth has had history the result of successive changes; the direct evidence of this is in the earth's constitution its points of revolution. The position of the earth made by the axis with its orbit are the surface of the earth lie buried the plant life and animal life of a past world, great depth, in huge stratification and in localities where species of animals and plants are now extinct.

Petrified wood in fletz formation, in fact entire trees, huge forest which have been flattened down lie buried under, un-decayed and in bark, roots, branches, filled with resin; a making for excellent fuel. Other huge forests, which have been flattened down lie buried under, are petrified into identifiable palm trees. These forests are usually found intact, lying flat firmly joined to their roots, others the trunks are broken off cleanly and separated from the roots. In the region of Bremen, all the treetops lie pointing to the southeast and northeast.

The Stratified formations there are very few remnants, but in later years, fossil plants on occur in the more recent strata and bones of amphibians, mammals and birds are most recent strata. Most astonishing, in fact, are bones of quadrupeds, elephants, tigers, lions, bears, and species now extinct. All of these huge animals lie not far below the surface.

The structure of the earth the whole formation of the alluvial terrains, bear the stamp of violent upheaval formations. On mountain ranges formations entirely of boulders and debris stuck together into a conglomerate, some smooth pebbles cemented together by sandstone and limestone. The stratification of deposits is very regular, one layer then the next layer. Consists of big stones almost all of exact thickness, the next layer of smaller stones and a third of still smaller stone. One such nagelfluhe deposit forms mountain chain forms 5,000 to 6,000 above sea level.

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:53 pm

[edited due to it being a stupid error. a_uk]

Barbara Brooks · Post by **Barbara Brooks** » Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:17 pm

Wait just a minute you asked me to write my interpretations of Hegel Philosophy of Nature? Now you tell me I copying him. It seems I just can't please you.

Barbara Brooks · Post by **Barbara Brooks** » Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:45 pm

I think the most important thing is I am trying to keep this important stuff alive. That is what I am doing the best way I can. my copy of Hegel's Philosophy of Nature was found in a library ready to be burned in 1983. When I finally recieved it I made a pack I would make it more understandable. I feel I have.

I challenge you to show my error.

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Sat Jan 17, 2009 8:57 pm

My apologies BB. I made a stupid mistake whilst using google and withdraw my accusations. I accept that these are your words and that they are your interpretation of what Hegel was saying.
a_uk
p.s.
I did not ask you to write these things. I just questioned why you did not but now I understand that this is what you have been doing and realise that I'm now back to where you started, and still the none wiser.

Barbara Brooks · Post by **Barbara Brooks** » Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:38 pm

I believe that a philosopher ought always to follow the paths beaten by great people and to imitate those who have been supreme. So, if I never become equally supreme, at least I will to be able to hit the mark.

Everything in earth cannot be explained, for probability plays its part in it. The sphere of geognosy is a very complex science, in knowing which layer of rocks is the oldest.

Earth, its particular solid structure does not yet possess life, it is inorganic earth, purely mechanical formation. In one place the earth is more contracted, in another more spread out, separates into water and land into continents and islands and the shaping and crystallizing of these into valleys and mountains.

In general, the land is split into two parts, the old world, and the new world. The old world, the mountain ranges run, overall, from west to east, southwest, or northwest. The new world mountain ranges run north and south; but the rivers flow to the east. The division of the world their differences are essential not contingent.

The design of the earth does not begin with a seed but begins in a two parts, the concrete granitic a coarse igneous rock made up of feldspar, mica and at least 20 percent quartz and calcareous principals. The granitic organism is the core of mountains, and the calcareous being mineral forms, metalleity and fossil objects.

Granite is the core of mountains and the calcareous is partly mineral, such as metal and fossils as the vein which form themselves into mountains.

A Geologist treats rock species and an oryctognosy treats lodes or veins. Geologists study the fundamental form of rocks and their variation, oryctognosy study veins that form themselves into mountains. The abstract formation into mountains is crystals, ores, and metals. The types of veins or lodes are seams in the mountains consisting of a medley of rocks and earth, cut by the lodes at various angles.

This core is granite that is so hard, so solid, that its parts are not easily separated. The hardness is composed of silica, quartz, and mica felspar has two directions, the external shape of the primitive rock, fletz-formation followed by alluvial terrain.

The last moment of the structure of earth the alluvial terrain that is a mixture of clay, sand and lime, marl, all wholly formless minerals. Argillaceous earth is granular, marble mineral through and through belongs partly to the fletz-formation and partly to alluvial terrain. Argillaceous earth and coal formations transform into peat, for peat has a vegetable origin and belongs to mineral kingdom.

Lusia Mousky · Post by **Lusia Mousky** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:33 pm

Philosophy is like an ocean, it comes by waves.
You can walk on the shore, look at the sky, listen to the murmur of the ocean.
Every now and then a little interesting stone or a shell left by a wave will catch your attention. You can pick it up ....

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:39 pm

Barbara Brooks wrote:I believe that a philosopher ought always to follow the paths beaten by great people and to imitate those who have been supreme. So, if I never become equally supreme, at least I will to be able to hit the mark.

I think I understand.

I believe that a 'philosopher' ought to use the map 'beaten' by the greats to get to the 'end of the path' and start 'philosophising' for themselves.

The point of the map is that we don't have to 're-beat' the exact same path. Which is what I think you are doing, whereas I think we can 'rush' to the 'end' and start exploring for ourselves.

Whats 'supreme' at one time is 'base' at another.

BB, if what you are trying to describe is the moment of comprehension you had when reading a philosophers words, I'd say that to philosophise about this is to turn the experience into words others can understand. If that is not possible then it's one of Wittgensteins 'moments'.
a_uk

Barbara Brooks · Post by **Barbara Brooks** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:54 pm

Arising UK,
Would you like to know what I think of you? You're acting like a weary mean unsatisfied old fool who elaborates small ridiculous ideas. Your reasoning is flawed, bankrupted, probably from lack of purpose.

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:57 pm

BB,

Thats nice and clear and did I have a choice? Pity your philosophical words do not reflect this approach.

I think you are upset by my words? Why is this?

I think you are a theist who 'lost' their belief then 'found' it again in a German philosphers words and you are now badly recreating that experience by blindly writing its English equivalent.

a_uk
p.s. This is also a good example of an 'ad whatever it is' attack.
p.p.s probably 'scientifically trained' as well(now this is an ad hominem attack).

Barbara Brooks · Post by **Barbara Brooks** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:01 am

I think you are a bag of wind.

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:03 am

Feel free. But think it reflects badly upon your avowed words.

Barbara Brooks · Post by **Barbara Brooks** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:15 am

Your mother wears old army boots.

Arising_uk · Post by **Arising_uk** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:30 am

p.s.
Although I do understand the offense so I'll just say, "She stole them off yours as her feet hardly ever touched the ground".