Philosophy Now Forum • Erotic v Pornographic - Page 7

Page 7 of 10

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:12 am

by Bill Wiltrack

.

..............................................OK. Um...a...a lot of great questions...

......................................................................

Could we start with one or two?

Here. Try this:

Multidimensional continuum means the multidimensional world we exist in.

Continuum, means that for us it does not end. There is no end of space. Far as we can tell.

Ego means whatever you want it to mean.Google, wiki are a great place to start. Each one of us has to define ego for ourselves. That's the only thing that matters.

Letters, words, sentences, all are impressions upon us. All are images upon our screen. All these images we interpret.

...can we see how you are able to digest those tid-bits first?

Good luck to you.

I am happy to help you philosophically.

...um, just so you know...we also have a Philosophical Counseling category. Love to see you there.

.................................................................................

.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:00 pm

by Arising_uk

Bill Wiltrack wrote:OK. Um...a...a lot of great questions...

Just a small portion of the ones I've asked you that you've not replied to.

Could we start with one or two?

Be my guest.

Here. Try this:

Multidimensional continuum means the multidimensional world we exist in.

It appears to be a three dimensional world. Is this what you mean by 'multi'?

Continuum, means that for us it does not end. There is no end of space. Far as we can tell.

Ah! See, the normal understanding is something like, a thing that has no gaps, "a continuous extent, succession, or whole, no part of which can be distinguished from neighboring parts except by arbitrary division." - Online dictionary. I think you mean "infinite" if you mean without end.

Ego means whatever you want it to mean.Google, wiki are a great place to start. Each one of us has to define ego for ourselves. That's the only thing that matters.

The trouble with goggle and wiki is you normally stay just there and often it appears you've not read the actual article.

So on a philosophy site a better place is with the Greeks and the Romans and the way we translate it is as the 'self'. The way you use appears to be more like the Freudians usage as you appear in conflict with it so I presume you think there is something else other than yourself?

Letters, words, sentences, all are impressions upon us. All are images upon our screen. All these images we interpret.

Apart from blind people that is?

I asked you what are these images and impressions of?

...can we see how you are able to digest those tid-bits first?

How's it going for you?

I am happy to help you philosophically.

Bit soon to judge I think.

...um, just so you know...we also have a Philosophical Counseling category. Love to see you there.

I'll be happy to help you with your counselling anytime. Although I thought you said the style I prefer was not for you? Still, look forward to you posting your issues there. You could start with this arse and anal fetish, as a Freudian would be most interested in it, something about your unconscious banging on your closet door I'd guess, or maybe in your 'replies' where you represent yourself in your images as a female, the closet also full of petticoats?

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:37 pm

by Bill Wiltrack

.

..........................................................................

.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:02 pm

by Arising_uk

Ah well, knew it couldn't last.

Must have confused your two brains attempting to answer questions about their thoughts.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:08 pm

by Bill Wiltrack

.

Just thought you may have needed a pick-me-up.

You seem kind of too serious.

...........................................................................................

........................................................................................Sometimes you just have to dance!

............................................................................................................................Enjoy!

.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:25 pm

by Arising_uk

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.

Just thought you may have needed a pick-me-up.

You seem kind of too serious.

Told you you weren't suited to philosophy. As its a breeze and fun asking and answering questions, clarifying ones thoughts and getting to understand anothers

Sometimes you just have to dance!

The difference between me and you Bill is that when I want to dance I do it in the real world.

Enjoy!

I do.

Whereas you say you are taking anti-depressants and philosophy comes from being depressed so why should I think your words worth anything? As I've read most of the main ones and pretty much none of them appear as you think.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:01 pm

by Bill Wiltrack

.

............................................................................

Ya know...I don't ever remember saying that I take anti-depressants.

Hey, could you point that out to me?...ya know, like EXACTLY where I said that. Where I stated that I take anti-depressants.

.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:15 pm

by Arising_uk

Bill Wiltrack wrote:Hey, could you point that out to me?[/b]...ya know, like EXACTLY where I said that. Where I stated that I take anti-depressants..

Remember that post where you gave your current drinks fad, the last one is an anti-depressant. New-Age tosh of course but still used as an anti-depressant.

Remember where you said all philosophy comes from being depressed? Well given you claim to be a 'real' philosopher I guess that makes you depressed.

Once again you distract to avoid answering the questions that you asked me to ask you.

Anyhoo, I guess they're off-topic so tell you what I'll gather all the ones you've never answered and post them so that you can take your time. Be a while tho' as there are a shitoad of them I guess.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:47 pm

by Bill Wiltrack

.

WOW, THAT'S REALLY a streeeeeetch.

.........................................................................................

..........................................................................................You are REALLY giving my words a work-out!

Lemon Balm - used as a mild sedative. The herb is listed on the FDA's "Generally Recognized as Safe" List, and has no unsafe side effects.

5-HTP 5-Hydroxytryptphan - also known as oxitriptan (INN), is a naturally occurring amino acid and chemical precursor as well as a metabolic intermediate in the biosynthesis of the neurotransmitters serotonin and melatonin from tryptophan.

5-HTP is sold over the counter in the United Kingdom, United States and Canada as a dietary supplement for use as an antidepressant, appetite suppressant, and sleep aid, and is also marketed in many European countries for the indication of major depression under trade names like Cincofarm, Levothym, Levotonine, Oxyfan, Telesol, Tript-OH, and Triptum.[1][2] Several double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of 5-HTP in the treatment of depression,[1] though a lack of high quality studies has been noted.[3] More and larger studies are needed to determine if 5-HTP is truly effective in treating depression.[4]

~ Wiki ~

I think you are jumping the gun a bit.

I don't mind you attacking me, matter of fact, I welcome it.

I do that issue with you making an inference that anyone's who may be taking a psychotropic medication does not have a valuable opinion, or their opinion is of less value than yours. That's just false.

You are wrong and I will stand for ANY member her at the Philosophy Now Forums who may take psychotropic medication or may use coffee, alcohol or other mind altering drugs. Their opinion still matters, a lot.

.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:12 pm

by Arising_uk

Did you read the wiki before you posted it!?

Bill Wiltrack wrote:
WOW, THAT'S REALLY a streeeeeetch.

Is it? So tell me, why are you taking a mild sedative and a natural anti-depressant?

http://i.minus.com/ibt5wmla9NJ1s7.gif

Again with the arses and now rimming?

*Knock Knock*
Who's there?
Me outside your closet.

I think you are jumping the gun a bit.

I don't mind you attacking me, matter of fact, I welcome it.

I do that issue with you making an inference that anyone's who may be taking a psychotropic medication does not have a valuable opinion, or their opinion is of less value than yours. That's just false.

"psychotropic medication"

I did not make the inference that it is was the drugs. I made the inference that it was the depression. This I deduced from your assertion that you are a 'real' philosopher and that real philosophy comes from being depressed.

You are wrong and I will stand for ANY member her at the Philosophy Now Forums who may take psychotropic medication or may use coffee, alcohol or other mind altering drugs. Their opinion still matters, a lot.

Do you hold this as a strong opinion? Anyhoo, their opinion does matter but to them and theres no "a lot" needed from you nor do these "ANY" members need your 'protection' in this matter.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:15 pm

by uwot

Bill
For those of us who don't speak gif, could you use subtitles?

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:24 pm

by Bill Wiltrack

.

The GIFs & images I use are perfectly fine when YOU interpret them FOR YOURSELF.

Don't try to think of a right or a wrong way to interpret anything I post.

....................................................................

....................................................................................................................................ENJOY!

.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:47 am

by Arising_uk

Bill Wiltrack wrote:The GIFs & images I use are perfectly fine when YOU interpret them FOR YOURSELF.

Don't try to think of a right or a wrong way to interpret anything I post.

We don't, but obviously you have an interpretation for them else why choose them? Its this we'd like to hear along with the piccys. As this is a philosophy forum not a psychology one. If it was one of those you'd be a most interesting subject.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:02 am

by Bill Wiltrack

.

You guys look up to me. I really appreciate that.

But you have to do some thinking yourself.

I'm not slamming either of you. I DO APPRECIATE YOU and the position you attribute to me.

Let it suffice to say I DO choose the images and GIFs to have a special affect upon you.

All you have to do is see the impression. That's IT! There is no right or wrong.

YOU ARE FINE.

Just...

..............................................................................

Be aware of the obvious...

.

Re: Erotic v Pornographic

Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:26 am

by Felasco

Bill Wiltrack wrote:Let it suffice to say I DO choose the images and GIFs to have a special affect upon you.

Yes, and that special effect is annoyance, as you travel from one philosophy forum to another filling them all to overflowing with crap.

Everywhere you go, your fellow posters object to your bulk crap posting style, and because you don't give a shit about anybody but yourself you just keep posting, posting, posting, more and more nothing, nothing, nothing.

There are forums where what you want to do would be appropriate and welcome. Please be kind to yourself and everybody else and go find them.