PhilosophicalCaveman wrote:Wouldn't it be simpler to not force any religious group to marry off people of the same-sex and just let those persons get married freely by other means...That is legally, but lacking the religious ceremonial aspect.
That would necessitate the religious people shutting up.
The other problem is that many same sex couples are religious.
True, but even if they talk, let them, all that matters will be the legal aspect, that it will be open for those who wish to go along with that lifestyle. Also if a same-sex couple is religious or follow a certain religion then they'll have to adhere to it or take the option of leaving. I say this and it might seem harsh but Religious groups are in their rights to deny certain things that goes against their religion. Putting a separation between 'Church' and legal things or Government matters, will ensure that both sides can go about their business.
chaz wyman wrote:
That would necessitate the religious people shutting up.
The other problem is that many same sex couples are religious.
True, but even if they talk, let them, all that matters will be the legal aspect, that it will be open for those who wish to go along with that lifestyle. Also if a same-sex couple is religious or follow a certain religion then they'll have to adhere to it or take the option of leaving. I say this and it might seem harsh but Religious groups are in their rights to deny certain things that goes against their religion. Putting a separation between 'Church' and legal things or Government matters, will ensure that both sides can go about their business.
Yes it does look like that.
Catholics are only one part of the moral majority. Some might not like it, but what the Pope says goes, and them together with the other churches end up telling the US governments what to do.
Yes it does look like that.
Catholics are only one part of the moral majority. Some might not like it, but what the Pope says goes, and them together with the other churches end up telling the US governments what to do.
The Pope also says with his actions that protecting pedophiles and not using condoms is a good moral position.
Yes it does look like that.
Catholics are only one part of the moral majority. Some might not like it, but what the Pope says goes, and them together with the other churches end up telling the US governments what to do.
The Pope also says with his actions that protecting pedophiles and not using condoms is a good moral position.
Do you also believe that?
Regards
DL
What do you mean? Are you asking if I believe what you say, or are you asking if I think the Pope is right?
I think the Pope is a sick person. He actually stated that using condoms increases the incidence of AIDS - I understand he was force to recant that view - but the damage has been done.
His protection of Paedophiles is on ongoing project for which he deserves to be exposed as a procurer of children to his acolytes.
Yes it does look like that.
Catholics are only one part of the moral majority. Some might not like it, but what the Pope says goes, and them together with the other churches end up telling the US governments what to do.
The Pope also says with his actions that protecting pedophiles and not using condoms is a good moral position.
Do you also believe that?
Regards
DL
What do you mean? Are you asking if I believe what you say, or are you asking if I think the Pope is right?
I think the Pope is a sick person. He actually stated that using condoms increases the incidence of AIDS - I understand he was force to recant that view - but the damage has been done.
His protection of Paedophiles is on ongoing project for which he deserves to be exposed as a procurer of children to his acolytes.
Greatest I am wrote:
The Pope also says with his actions that protecting pedophiles and not using condoms is a good moral position.
Do you also believe that?
Regards
DL
What do you mean? Are you asking if I believe what you say, or are you asking if I think the Pope is right?
I think the Pope is a sick person. He actually stated that using condoms increases the incidence of AIDS - I understand he was force to recant that view - but the damage has been done.
His protection of Paedophiles is on ongoing project for which he deserves to be exposed as a procurer of children to his acolytes.
