For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Ihave the same issue with it that FJ does, it's slovenly, moronic and inadequate. I already explained that rigid definitions are usually impossible to get right and I definitely mentioned that this is something I would expect anybody with an introductory level of education in philosophy to readily understand having addressed questions to do with other things that cannot be adequately definied such as knowledge and meanings.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:28 pmFair enough. You seemed to have some issue with Trump's answer to what a "woman" is. If you don't have an issue with it, then I don't either.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:02 pmYou raised the matter of nhilism not me. If you had some plan for that, make whatever your play is, but don't put words into my mouth.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 2:58 pm
By "gender nihilism" are you suggesting that anyone can be any gender?
You don’t need to put words in my mouth, I didn’t say that. You did.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:18 pm Women who don't or can't give life to babies are not women, you heard it here first. Thanks fairy.
He should know not to stick his dick into crazy, he's responsible for his own mess. I don't really care about your horrid northern soap opera.
If you don’t like Trump then FUCK OFF and go to a thread that most suits your philosophy. This is my thread and I get to direct and manage it the way I want it to be managed.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:42 pmIhave the same issue with it that FJ does, it's slovenly, moronic and inadequate. I already explained that rigid definitions are usually impossible to get right and I definitely mentioned that this is something I would expect anybody with an introductory level of education in philosophy to readily understand having addressed questions to do with other things that cannot be adequately definied such as knowledge and meanings.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:28 pmFair enough. You seemed to have some issue with Trump's answer to what a "woman" is. If you don't have an issue with it, then I don't either.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:02 pm
You raised the matter of nhilism not me. If you had some plan for that, make whatever your play is, but don't put words into my mouth.
How is this difficult to get? I understand the likes of DAM and Veggie and Henry and Immanuel Can having difficulty with this sort of thing because none of them has the relevant education. But you do. This should be super easy for you, if not for them.
Who is talking about 'forced to agree'? Why did you bring that up? Seems completely out of left field.Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:42 pmYou don’t need to put words in my mouth, I didn’t say that. You did.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:18 pm Women who don't or can't give life to babies are not women, you heard it here first. Thanks fairy.
Look, if you don’t agree that the definition was accurate and enough then fine, I don’t actually give a fuck.
This thread is about Trump’s opinions, no one is being forced to agree with him.
Then mourn for his absence then you pathetic little low life worm of a man.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:46 pmHe should know not to stick his dick into crazy, he's responsible for his own mess. I don't really care about your horrid northern soap opera.
Okay you’ve made your point. Now whatFlannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:47 pmWho is talking about 'forced to agree'? Why did you bring that up? Seems completely out of left field.Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:42 pmYou don’t need to put words in my mouth, I didn’t say that. You did.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:18 pm Women who don't or can't give life to babies are not women, you heard it here first. Thanks fairy.
Look, if you don’t agree that the definition was accurate and enough then fine, I don’t actually give a fuck.
This thread is about Trump’s opinions, no one is being forced to agree with him.
Of course we aren't forced to agree. And it's a good thing, because the definition is terrible. It doesn't include anybody with serious fertility issues. They're all not women according to Trump's definition, and by extension your definition.
?Just so you know Harbal wouldn’t be very impressed with that comment. He told me that he considered himself to be a very highly intelligent man.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:46 pmHe should know not to stick his dick into crazy, he's responsible for his own mess. I don't really care about your horrid northern soap opera.
I think Trump’s definition was sound, accurate, and anatomically correct. That’s all there is for me to say. I have no further comment on the subject matter.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:51 pmWell ideally now you say "yes, i realize that not all women can give birth, and so realize that defining a woman as someone with the ability to give birth excludes those women, when it shouldn't".
I don't know how old she is, but... damn, roasted.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:59 pmNo you aren't, you are way past the birth-giving age. You don't meet your own definition.
I’m turning 68 In July.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 4:02 pmI don't know how old she is, but... damn, roasted.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 3:59 pmNo you aren't, you are way past the birth-giving age. You don't meet your own definition.