Philosophy Now Forum

ThinkOfOne wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 11:47 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 11:11 pm

ThinkOfOne wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 10:42 pm

C'mon. It's very much due to your limitations that you are unable to succinctly and substantively articulate what you have in mind. Not everyone has the requisite skills. Evidently you also lack the humility to understand your limitations. As such, you blame shift. Seems to be all too common these days. Seems like there was a time not too long ago that most people at least understood enough to understand their limitations. Evidently you are not one of those people.

I see you still didn't pick a subtopic. Have you posted anything other than empty bullshit so far?

Okay. You've made it clear that you're only on this forum to troll.

I'm only about 1/3 troll. Not sure what you are, I looked over your comments and 80% of them are just insults. The rest that is actually trying to say something, is stuff like this

Multiculturalism and diversity ARE OK. Those who say otherwise do so because they have self-centered and simplistic views. Not unlike children who have yet to have gained much in the way of emotional and mental maturity.

No serious person would say this, even if they argued in favor of multiculturalism. Looks like you have an agenda to push, what's the agenda?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:55 am

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 1:58 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:18 pm

He's just like you!

But, when you asked me to provide 'some arguments' for some thing that I said and claimed 'I', unlike "atla", did provide 'some arguments'. And, exactly like you wanted me to.

The difference here is "atla" never answers and clarifies the actual clarifying questions I ask it. Whereas, only on the very rarest of occasions I do not. And, those times are always when the clarifying questions are in regards to 'me', alone, and not about 'the words' I put down here.

No you didn't, you just said you had already provided them.

1. I provided some arguments 'after' you asked me to. As can be clearly seen in the post I directed you to. Others saw them and responded to them. Why it is so hard for you to find them is beyond amazing, now.

2. Yes, I did say I had already provided some arguments. But, that in no way means that U did not provide more arguments.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:55 am Also, you keep saying you provided it after I asked for it,

Yes, because I did.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:55 am but in your reply to me you said "as I said, I have already done it."

Are you under some sort of belief that it is an impossibility to provide some arguments, for the same thing, more than once here?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:55 am Do you know what that means in English?

Maybe, do you know what this means in "english"?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:55 am In English, you only say "I have already done it" if you did it BEFORE it was requested

Which, as I have informed you numerous times already, I already did it BEFORE, you requested it.

As well as AFTER, you requested it.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 7:55 amAre you aware of how that phrase works?

Yes.

Will you ever become aware of what I have been saying and telling you here?

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2024 11:43 am
Yes.

Will you ever become aware of what I have been saying and telling you here?

Hold on, I was just trying to remember the capital of Greenland.