Page 7 of 7
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:36 pm
by night912
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 5:48 pm
night912 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 4:53 pm
Apparently, there's no point in continuing our discussion further because you're not willing to know what was actually being discussed. Ironically, you tried to explain what validity is, while not giving any valid points to what is being discussed.
Ironically. You don't even know what irony is. Or validity.
Apparently, you lack originality as well.
Re: The constructivist animosity against the law of the excluded middle
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:51 pm
by Skepdick
night912 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:36 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 5:48 pm
night912 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 4:53 pm
Apparently, there's no point in continuing our discussion further because you're not willing to know what was actually being discussed. Ironically, you tried to explain what validity is, while not giving any valid points to what is being discussed.
Ironically. You don't even know what irony is. Or validity.
Apparently, you lack originality as well.
Even your insults are unoriginal.
Is there anything worth-while about you?